My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Point Flow Analysis Software for the Lower South Platte River
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Point Flow Analysis Software for the Lower South Platte River
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2013 5:04:39 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 3:09:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
User Guide: Point Flow Module & Querying & Charting Module
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
12/1/1994
Author
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District
Title
User Guide for the Point Flow Analysis Software for the Lower South Platte River Kersey to Julesburg
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
additional river reach), all subreach gains and river flows are re- calculated on for that particular <br />day and in the same manner as presented above. For the Lower South Platte River daily point <br />flow analysis discussed in detail in this User's Guide (spanning water years 1981 - 1993), a <br />negative flow occurring below a structure was computed 3,256 times, or 1.5 percent. A bar chart <br />illustrating the location and frequency of such negative flow computations is presented in <br />Appendix I. <br />Figure 2 and Table 1 illustrate the procedures utilized to compute subreach gains and river flows. <br />Figure 2 presents a river segment characterized by two (2) gauging stations encompassing five (5) <br />structures (three (3) diversion points and two (2) inflow points). Table 1 indexes both the <br />computed subreach gains and river flows associated with Figure 2. <br />Figure 2 - River segment illustrating subreach gain and river flow computations. <br />Due to the fact that Canal B is specified as 'Drying River', two reaches exist within the river <br />segment portrayed in Figure 2. The upper reach is defined as being from Gauge A to Canal B, <br />while the lower reach begins -at Canal B and extends to Gauge B. The total gain for each reach is <br />computed by summing fluxes across each reach boundary. This results in a gain of +2.0 cfs <br />(- (10 +3- 6 -9 -0)) within the upper reach and a gain of +1.0 cfs (- (0 +7 -4 -4)) within the lower reach. <br />Note the zero flow boundary below Canal B. The total reach gains are then converted to a river <br />mile basis by dividing the reach gain by its respective reach distance (7.0 river miles for the upper <br />reach, 6.0 river miles for the lower reach). The resulting subreach gains are presented in both <br />Figure 2 and Table 1 (0.29 and 0.17 cfs /river miles, respectively). <br />The river flows occurring above and below each structure are the result of incorporating <br />calculated subreach gains with fluxes occurring at each structure. For example, the water flowing <br />within the river channel directly up river of Stream A is the summation of the flow crossing <br />Gauge A (10.0 cfs) and total gain occurring in Subreach I. Total Subreach I gain is the product <br />of Subreach I gain on a per river mile basis and subreach length (0.29 cfs /river mile x 2.5 river <br />9 ptflguid.wpd <br />a <br />o <br />1 <br />v�d <br />A <br />yd <br />N <br />Riva 01 <br />Chamd <br />Sulbmwh <br />14 <br />Suubr=& <br />Subr=& Subreach <br />" <br />Suubft'M�1' Su1brm& <br />" <br />I <br />II <br />III IV <br />v VI <br />I <br />C <br />N <br />Ct <br />C, <br />I <br />V d iiiiii <br />I <br />I <br />I • <br />I <br />Total Reach Oak - +2.0 c6 <br />Total Rh G i. - +1.0 cf. <br />I <br />029 cfdrim mile <br />0.17 cfs/dm m& <br />Figure 2 - River segment illustrating subreach gain and river flow computations. <br />Due to the fact that Canal B is specified as 'Drying River', two reaches exist within the river <br />segment portrayed in Figure 2. The upper reach is defined as being from Gauge A to Canal B, <br />while the lower reach begins -at Canal B and extends to Gauge B. The total gain for each reach is <br />computed by summing fluxes across each reach boundary. This results in a gain of +2.0 cfs <br />(- (10 +3- 6 -9 -0)) within the upper reach and a gain of +1.0 cfs (- (0 +7 -4 -4)) within the lower reach. <br />Note the zero flow boundary below Canal B. The total reach gains are then converted to a river <br />mile basis by dividing the reach gain by its respective reach distance (7.0 river miles for the upper <br />reach, 6.0 river miles for the lower reach). The resulting subreach gains are presented in both <br />Figure 2 and Table 1 (0.29 and 0.17 cfs /river miles, respectively). <br />The river flows occurring above and below each structure are the result of incorporating <br />calculated subreach gains with fluxes occurring at each structure. For example, the water flowing <br />within the river channel directly up river of Stream A is the summation of the flow crossing <br />Gauge A (10.0 cfs) and total gain occurring in Subreach I. Total Subreach I gain is the product <br />of Subreach I gain on a per river mile basis and subreach length (0.29 cfs /river mile x 2.5 river <br />9 ptflguid.wpd <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.