My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Documentation of Existing Conditions in the Central Platte Valley
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Documentation of Existing Conditions in the Central Platte Valley
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2013 3:13:14 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 11:40:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
86
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/2/1999
Author
URS Greiner Woodward Clyde Federal Services
Title
Documentation of Existing Conditions in the Central Platte Valley, Draft Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SECTIONTHREE <br />3.1 HISTORY <br />Whooping Crane <br />The whooping crane (Grus americana) is the rarest of the world's 15 species of cranes (Mein <br />and Archibald 1996). It was listed as a federally endangered species on March 11, 1967, and <br />critical habitat was designated on May 15, 1978. The principal historic breeding range of the <br />whooping crane extended from central Illinois northwestward through northern Iowa, western <br />Minnesota, northeastern North Dakota, southern Manitoba and Saskatchewan, and the general <br />vicinity of Edmonton, Alberta, to the present nesting area of Wood Buffalo National Park (Wood <br />Buffalo), Northwest Territories in Canada (FWS 1994). Winter distribution was primarily along <br />the Gulf of Mexico from Louisiana to northeastern Mexico. There were several migration routes, <br />including a lesser migration route that crossed the Appalachian Mountains to wintering areas <br />along the Atlantic Coast. Some whooping cranes were believed to have migrated to interior <br />Mexico, following the migration route of sandhill cranes. A non - migratory population occurred <br />in southwestern Louisiana. <br />Allen (1952) estimated that the whooping crane population in "...1860, or possibly 1870, totaled <br />between 1,300 to 1,400 individuals." Banks (1978) used two independent techniques to derive <br />population estimates of 500 to 700 whooping cranes present in 1870. Habitat loss throughout <br />most of its former breeding range in central North America contributed to population declines. <br />One non - migratory population of whooping cranes in southwest Louisiana was decimated by a <br />hurricane in 1940 and later became extinct. By 1941, the migratory population reached a low of <br />16 individuals with 6 -8 breeding birds. Legal protection was obtained, and habitat acquisitions <br />and intensive management instituted for important wintering, breeding, and migrational habitats. <br />Numbers of the wild population increased from less than 30 in the 1940s to 187 in the winter of <br />1997 -1998 (Table 3 -1). <br />The only remaining, naturally - reproducing, and self - sustaining population occupies single <br />nesting and breeding areas, which are linked by a relatively narrow migrational corridor (Figure <br />3 -1). This population nests in Wood Buffalo and winters on and near the Aransas National <br />Wildlife Refuge (Aransas) along the Texas coast (Aransas-Wood Buffalo population). It <br />migrates through Nebraska twice each year. <br />A 20 -year -long interagency experiment to establish a whooping crane population within the <br />intermountain region of the Rocky Mountains has been abandoned. This involved transplanting <br />eggs from whooping crane nests to be hatched and cross - fostered by sandhill cranes. Lack of <br />whooping crane reproduction and high mortality rates led to discontinuance of the experiment. A <br />second experimental effort to establish a nonmigratory wild breeding population was initiated at <br />Kissimminee Prairie in Florida in 1993 and consisted of 52 birds in 1996. <br />3.2 REASONS FOR DECLINE <br />The whooping crane became endangered as a result of human activities that adversely altered or <br />destroyed whooping crane habitat and shooting. The primary factors involved were loss of <br />nesting habitat in the northern Great Plains of the United States and prairie provinces of Canada <br />due to expanding human settlement agricultural development; loss of wintering habitat due to <br />agricultural expansion; and increased hazards of migration as a result of human development <br />INS 8reLw Wb ftwit Clyde <br />FedWWSerftes 68FOD9728600lr1.dx 601999(9:52AM)/URSGWCFW 3-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.