My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Documentation of Existing Conditions in the Central Platte Valley
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Documentation of Existing Conditions in the Central Platte Valley
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2013 3:13:14 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 11:40:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
86
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/2/1999
Author
URS Greiner Woodward Clyde Federal Services
Title
Documentation of Existing Conditions in the Central Platte Valley, Draft Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />SECTIOHTWO Enuironmentai Setting <br />2.9.4 Habitat Restoration <br />The locations, sizes, and methods of accretion land clearing projects appear to be adequately <br />documented, although specific details are lacking for some areas. There appears to be limited <br />documentation of habitat changes and conditions resulting from the projects. <br />The creation of nesting habitat for least terns and piping plovers has been well documented by <br />NPPD and provides an adequate baseline. <br />The relative -success of the Trust's bottomland grassland and wet meadow restoration projects <br />has not been well documented to date. The three demonstration wet meadow enhancement . <br />projects are in early stages of completion, but include provisions for detailed monitoring. <br />Restoration of wetlands is often difficult (Kusler and Kentula 1990): partial failures are <br />common, the ability to restore or create particular wetland functions varies by function, long- <br />term success may be quite different than short-term success, and total duplication of naturally - <br />functioning wetlands is probably impossible. Evaluation of the success of restoration projects <br />will depend on having specific goals and use of monitoring to assess achievement of those goals. <br />The existing knowledge of native wet meadow processes and functions may not be sufficient to <br />identify good criteria for assessing success of restoration. <br />1 <br />7 <br />'A <br />i <br />_J <br />!1 <br />J <br />1 <br />lU brier Wwdward Ctyrde <br />68FOD9728600 /rl.doc 6/2/1999(9:52AM)AJRSGWCFS2 2-15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.