My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Evaluation of Effects of the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Evaluation of Effects of the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2013 4:06:56 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 11:05:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/16/2000
Author
PRRIP
Title
Evaluation of Effects of the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program (In Fulfillment of Milestone 113 -1 by U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would be found by the Service to likely jeopardize the continued existence of the target <br />species or adversely modify designated critical habitat; and <br />help prevent the need to list more basin associated species pursuant to the Endangered <br />Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). <br />The long -term objectives of the Program are: 1) to provide sufficient water to and through the <br />central Platte River (via reregulation and water conservation/supply projects) to improve and <br />maintain habitats associated with the target species; and 2) to perpetually protect and, where <br />appropriate, restore approximately 29,000 acres of suitable habitat in the central Platte River area in <br />ten habitat complexes located between Lexington and Chapman, Nebraska. <br />The Program will be implemented on an incremental basis, the first increment being 10 -13 years in <br />length. The goals for the first increment include: 1) improve the occurrence of Platte River flows <br />relative to the present occurrence of Service target flows by an average of 130,000 to 150,000 acre - <br />feet per year as measured at Grand Island, through reregulation and water conservation supply <br />projects; and 2) protect and, where appropriate, restore at least 10,000 acres in habitat complexes <br />located between Lexington and Chapman. <br />This proposed Program will be reviewed pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, and a <br />preferred alternative may be identified in the subsequent Environmental Impact Statement. The <br />proposed Program (and preferred alternative, if different) will also be reviewed by the Service via a <br />programmatic consultation pursuant to the ESA. <br />The Evaluation Process for Determining Program Benefits <br />The evaluation process addresses the effects of the first increment "mitigation measures" as <br />identified in the CA. As additional Program activities for habitat improvements are identified, the <br />Service will provide procedures to evaluate the effects of those activities on species and their <br />habitats, consistent with the intent of Milestone R3 -1. <br />The following process will be used by the Service to evaluate Program benefits to the target species <br />and their habitats by the end of the first increment. That evaluation will be based, as required by the <br />ESA, on the best scientific information available, including results of studies pursuant to the <br />Program's Integrated Monitoring and Research Component (IMRC) or other research, new or <br />revised models incorporating those results, etc.). The process assumes the Service determines via <br />their ESA review prior to Program implementation that the Program (or preferred alternative) will <br />adequately offset the effects of water development projects on the target species during the first <br />increment. <br />Prior to Pro rg; am Implementation: <br />-- 1. Suitable habitat for each target species will be defined based on current knowledge (e.g., Joint <br />Study, revised models, input by species experts), recognizing that future data may alter or refine <br />that definition. A preliminary definition of suitable habitat is attached. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.