My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Estimating Additional Water Yield From Changes in Management of National Forests in the North Platte Basin
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Estimating Additional Water Yield From Changes in Management of National Forests in the North Platte Basin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 2:57:42 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 10:50:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
An Independent Report Prepared for the Platte River EIS Office U.S. Department of the Interior Related to Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP),
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
North Platte
Water Division
6
Date
5/12/2000
Author
Charles A. Troendle, Matcom Corporation & James M. Nankervis, Blue Mountain Consultants
Title
Estimating Additional Water Yield from Changes in Management of Ntional Forests in the North Platte Bains, Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
species. The relationships for lodgepole pine, spruce -fir, and aspen, the three <br />most prevalent species, are presented in figures 12a — 12c. <br />Lodgepole Forests <br />180 <br />160 <br />I i 140 - <br />120 <br />100 <br />Q 80 <br />m 60 <br />16 40 <br />20 j <br />0 <br />0 50 100 150 200 <br />Age <br />i <br />Figure 12a: Relationship between basal area (Y) and age (X) for Lodgepole Pine. <br />I <br />Spruce -Fir Forests <br />180 <br />1 <br />y <br />a <br />io <br />I q <br />0 50 100 150 200 250 <br />Age <br />60 Y = 0.7865x + 10.07 <br />R = 0.9248 <br />1 • <br />40 <br />1 • <br />20 <br />1 • • <br />00 <br />80 <br />60 <br />ro <br />Figure 12b: Relationship between basal area (Y) an <br />i 140 y ° 1_0841x+ 20.329 <br />2! 120 <br />m • <br />100 <br />m 80 <br />a 60 • <br />is <br />y 40 • • <br />R <br />I � 20 • <br />0 <br />0 20 40 60 80 100 120 <br />Age <br />i <br />Figure 12c: Relationship between basal area (Y) an <br />25 <br />d age (X) for Spruce -Fir. <br />Aspen Forests <br />160 <br />d age (X) for Aspen. <br />40 • <br />• <br />• <br />20 • <br />• <br />0 <br />i 140 y ° 1_0841x+ 20.329 <br />2! 120 <br />m • <br />100 <br />m 80 <br />a 60 • <br />is <br />y 40 • • <br />R <br />I � 20 • <br />0 <br />0 20 40 60 80 100 120 <br />Age <br />i <br />Figure 12c: Relationship between basal area (Y) an <br />25 <br />d age (X) for Spruce -Fir. <br />Aspen Forests <br />160 <br />d age (X) for Aspen. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.