Laserfiche WebLink
The 5H circular clear cuts imposed on the North Fork were intended to <br />maximize snow pack accumulation in the clear cuts and to optimize flow <br />increases for the basal area removed (Troendle and Leaf 1980). The <br />irregularly shaped openings placed in the Upper Basin were designed to <br />blend with the surroundings and create less visual impact than the circles, <br />increase edge effect for wildlife, and result in increased snow pack <br />accumulation and water yield. In contrast, it was reasoned that partial <br />cutting, as proposed for the North Slope, Unit 8, would have little effect on <br />stream flow because: (1) in a semi -arid environment such as the sub alpine <br />(Leaf 1975), the residual stand would have access to and use any <br />transpiration savings during the growing season; and '(2) without clear <br />cutting and the attendant aerodynamic changes in the canopy there would be <br />no redistribution of snow and no net change in the deposition pattern of the <br />winter snow pack; thus the efficiency in delivering water to the stream <br />would not be enhanced. The hypothesis resulting from these assumptions <br />were that the partial cutting (harvesting by individually marking trees for <br />removal or thinning) would be far less efficient in increasing stream flow <br />than would be the removal of the same percentage of the forest in small (5- <br />tH) clear cuts as imposed on both the North Fork and Upper Basin. <br />t <br />The h r Creek e ead o se C ee Watershed and its sub drainages were used as pilot <br />demonstration areas to evaluate management strategies that represented ca <br />1980 thinking on increasing water yield through timber harvest. The <br />circular. clear cuts imposed on the North Fork, and the irregular clear cuts in <br />the Upper Basin (figure 4), were expected to result in an increase in flow. <br />The shelterwood cut imposed on the North Slope was not expected to result <br />in a significant increase in flow. The first treatment imposed on Deadhorse <br />Creek occurred on the North Fork sub drainage in 1977. Timber was <br />removed on 36 percent of the land area (figure 4) by commercially clear <br />cutting 12 small circular units, uniformly spaced through the drainage. The <br />circular openings were about 5H (H= tree heights) in diameter, and occupied <br />about 3 acres each. Harvesting was completed in the summer of 1978. <br />During the summers of 1983 and 1984, approximately 30 percent of the <br />Upper Basin was harvested in irregular- shaped clear cuts, varying in size <br />from 1 -15 acres. Approximately 95 percent of the basal was removed in the <br />clear cuts on both sub drainages. The residual basal area represented either <br />non - commercial trees or advanced regeneration. Some snags were left <br />standing to provide wildlife habitat. <br />The 5H circular clear cuts imposed on the North Fork were intended to <br />maximize snow pack accumulation in the clear cuts and to optimize flow <br />increases for the basal area removed (Troendle and Leaf 1980). The <br />irregularly shaped openings placed in the Upper Basin were designed to <br />blend with the surroundings and create less visual impact than the circles, <br />increase edge effect for wildlife, and result in increased snow pack <br />accumulation and water yield. In contrast, it was reasoned that partial <br />cutting, as proposed for the North Slope, Unit 8, would have little effect on <br />stream flow because: (1) in a semi -arid environment such as the sub alpine <br />(Leaf 1975), the residual stand would have access to and use any <br />transpiration savings during the growing season; and '(2) without clear <br />cutting and the attendant aerodynamic changes in the canopy there would be <br />no redistribution of snow and no net change in the deposition pattern of the <br />winter snow pack; thus the efficiency in delivering water to the stream <br />would not be enhanced. The hypothesis resulting from these assumptions <br />were that the partial cutting (harvesting by individually marking trees for <br />removal or thinning) would be far less efficient in increasing stream flow <br />than would be the removal of the same percentage of the forest in small (5- <br />tH) clear cuts as imposed on both the North Fork and Upper Basin. <br />t <br />