My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Estimating Additional Water Yield From Changes in Management of National Forests in the North Platte Basin
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Estimating Additional Water Yield From Changes in Management of National Forests in the North Platte Basin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 2:57:42 PM
Creation date
3/6/2013 10:50:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
An Independent Report Prepared for the Platte River EIS Office U.S. Department of the Interior Related to Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP),
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
North Platte
Water Division
6
Date
5/12/2000
Author
Charles A. Troendle, Matcom Corporation & James M. Nankervis, Blue Mountain Consultants
Title
Estimating Additional Water Yield from Changes in Management of Ntional Forests in the North Platte Bains, Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The 5H circular clear cuts imposed on the North Fork were intended to <br />maximize snow pack accumulation in the clear cuts and to optimize flow <br />increases for the basal area removed (Troendle and Leaf 1980). The <br />irregularly shaped openings placed in the Upper Basin were designed to <br />blend with the surroundings and create less visual impact than the circles, <br />increase edge effect for wildlife, and result in increased snow pack <br />accumulation and water yield. In contrast, it was reasoned that partial <br />cutting, as proposed for the North Slope, Unit 8, would have little effect on <br />stream flow because: (1) in a semi -arid environment such as the sub alpine <br />(Leaf 1975), the residual stand would have access to and use any <br />transpiration savings during the growing season; and '(2) without clear <br />cutting and the attendant aerodynamic changes in the canopy there would be <br />no redistribution of snow and no net change in the deposition pattern of the <br />winter snow pack; thus the efficiency in delivering water to the stream <br />would not be enhanced. The hypothesis resulting from these assumptions <br />were that the partial cutting (harvesting by individually marking trees for <br />removal or thinning) would be far less efficient in increasing stream flow <br />than would be the removal of the same percentage of the forest in small (5- <br />tH) clear cuts as imposed on both the North Fork and Upper Basin. <br />t <br />The h r Creek e ead o se C ee Watershed and its sub drainages were used as pilot <br />demonstration areas to evaluate management strategies that represented ca <br />1980 thinking on increasing water yield through timber harvest. The <br />circular. clear cuts imposed on the North Fork, and the irregular clear cuts in <br />the Upper Basin (figure 4), were expected to result in an increase in flow. <br />The shelterwood cut imposed on the North Slope was not expected to result <br />in a significant increase in flow. The first treatment imposed on Deadhorse <br />Creek occurred on the North Fork sub drainage in 1977. Timber was <br />removed on 36 percent of the land area (figure 4) by commercially clear <br />cutting 12 small circular units, uniformly spaced through the drainage. The <br />circular openings were about 5H (H= tree heights) in diameter, and occupied <br />about 3 acres each. Harvesting was completed in the summer of 1978. <br />During the summers of 1983 and 1984, approximately 30 percent of the <br />Upper Basin was harvested in irregular- shaped clear cuts, varying in size <br />from 1 -15 acres. Approximately 95 percent of the basal was removed in the <br />clear cuts on both sub drainages. The residual basal area represented either <br />non - commercial trees or advanced regeneration. Some snags were left <br />standing to provide wildlife habitat. <br />The 5H circular clear cuts imposed on the North Fork were intended to <br />maximize snow pack accumulation in the clear cuts and to optimize flow <br />increases for the basal area removed (Troendle and Leaf 1980). The <br />irregularly shaped openings placed in the Upper Basin were designed to <br />blend with the surroundings and create less visual impact than the circles, <br />increase edge effect for wildlife, and result in increased snow pack <br />accumulation and water yield. In contrast, it was reasoned that partial <br />cutting, as proposed for the North Slope, Unit 8, would have little effect on <br />stream flow because: (1) in a semi -arid environment such as the sub alpine <br />(Leaf 1975), the residual stand would have access to and use any <br />transpiration savings during the growing season; and '(2) without clear <br />cutting and the attendant aerodynamic changes in the canopy there would be <br />no redistribution of snow and no net change in the deposition pattern of the <br />winter snow pack; thus the efficiency in delivering water to the stream <br />would not be enhanced. The hypothesis resulting from these assumptions <br />were that the partial cutting (harvesting by individually marking trees for <br />removal or thinning) would be far less efficient in increasing stream flow <br />than would be the removal of the same percentage of the forest in small (5- <br />tH) clear cuts as imposed on both the North Fork and Upper Basin. <br />t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.