Laserfiche WebLink
Brown, Rick <br />From: Mark M. Czaplewski [czaplews@linux3. nrc. state. ne. us] <br />Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 7:10 AM <br />To: Derby, Clayton <br />Cc: Tebbel, Paul <br />Subject: Tech Committee Issues <br />Clayton, <br />In response to Paul's request for issues for discussion at next <br />week's Tech Committee workshop with the GC, please note the points <br />listed below. They don't constitute issues that haven't been brought up <br />in past meetings (as Paul noted) but they are ones which still need <br />discussion /resolution. <br />- Baseline Document (R1 -1) - Status and purpose of document, status of <br />comments provided, peer review, Nickum's assessment, addressing data <br />gaps, etc. <br />- Biological Response Document (R3 -1) - expectations and use, compliance, <br />incorporation into IMRC, protocols, analysis methods, etc. <br />-Peer Review - Status of Milestone R4 -1 given current schedules and <br />lack of completed R1 -1, R2 -1 and R3 -1 documents. <br />"Cooperative" approach vs. abrogation of authority by DO[ <br />- Pallid sturgeon - related monitoring and research <br />- Reliance on outdated Platte River Joint Management documents (including <br />drafts) <br />- Incorporation of off channel habitat restoration /management activities <br />