Laserfiche WebLink
in the framework for a long -term recovery program to satisfy the Endangered Species Act <br />requirements for all water users in the basin. At the same time, the federal government is <br />conducting formal environmental reviews. This process is expected to take three to four years. <br />The proposed recovery program will be flexible and proceed in steps, or increments. Its <br />progress will be continually evaluated and adjustments made based on experience and the best <br />available information. The states and the federal government will share the responsibility for <br />providing land and water for the proposed Program. <br />During the first increment (10 -13 years) of the proposed program, the federal government <br />will contribute $37.5 million, Colorado and Nebraska will contribute $15 million respectively, <br />and Wyoming will contribute $7.5 million. A long -term recovery program will result from the <br />Cooperative Agreement only if each of the three. states and the Department of the Interior find <br />that the proposed program is in their best interest. If they do not, federal agencies could return to <br />the project -by- project approach for offsetting impacts to the listed species. As several water users <br />along Colorado's Front Range experienced in the early 1990s, individual mitigation measures are <br />extremely costly. <br />Management and Oversight of the Agreement <br />A 10- member Governance Committee is in charge of implementing the Cooperative <br />Agreement. The Governance Committee has one member each from Colorado, Wyoming, <br />Nebraska, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation; three water <br />user members, one from each state; and two environmental organization members. <br />Committees that address land, water, technical, finance, and public outreach issues assist <br />the Governance Committee. These committees include farmers and representatives of state <br />agencies, cities, irrigation districts, and conservation organizations. <br />The Governance Committee is built on compromise and consensus. Each state and <br />federal member of the Governance Committee can veto any decision, and any two members <br />together are enough to block a policy action. Whether there will be a long -term program depends <br />on. the Governance Committee's ability to satisfy all its members. <br />How Would Colorado Water Users Be Affected? <br />Everyone has heard stories of how projects and development are stopped or delayed <br />because of endangered species. The Cooperative Agreement is intended to reduce endangered <br />species controversies by aiding species recovery and keeping new species from being listed. At <br />this time, the proposed recovery program is the best alternative to the expense and uncertainty <br />associated with individual permit consultations, which entities along Colorado's Front Range <br />have experienced in recent years without the program. <br />The recovery program would provide the mitigation needed to allow water users in <br />Colorado to continue their existing uses incases where federal permits and licenses are required. <br />Colorado's portion of the proposed program is designed to allow new water projects to go <br />forward with offsets for future depletions. The proposed recovery program should streamline <br />permit acquisition for those activities and allow all Colorado water users to essentially do <br />business "as usual." <br />Land and Water for the Species <br />In order for water users to receive regulatory certainty for their water activities, the <br />participants must, in turn, provide more water and land to enhance and protect the habitat for the <br />target species. Using a concept known as "adaptive management," the Governance Committee <br />will monitor the impacts of water and land activities developed for the proposed recovery <br />program to determine what adjustments or additional actions may be needed. <br />