Laserfiche WebLink
Prior to the comprehensive review of items 3 through 6, the Consultant will <br />complete a preliminary, written review of items 1 and 2, above. The results of <br />this review will be provided to the State representatives. A meeting will be held <br />to discuss the results of the review. These discussions may result in modifications <br />in the contract scope and budget. <br />Examples of questions to be considered in the review would include: <br />• What data, reports, or other information was relied upon by the <br />EIS Team and the FWS in their ESA review of the Program? Was <br />the right information used? Was it used in the right manner? Was <br />there important information that was not considered? <br />• What are the facts and assumptions presented in the EIS <br />documents? Are there any assumptions presented as facts? <br />Are the assumptions appropriate or do they inappropriately impact <br />the results? On critical assumptions, sensitivity analyses should be <br />completed. <br />• What conclusions are drawn by the EIS Team and the FWS in their <br />ESA review of the Program? Are these conclusions supported by <br />the information they relied upon? Would their conclusions have <br />been different if they would have considered all available <br />information? If yes, in what way? <br />• Are there any errors, inconsistencies, or other inaccuracies in the <br />EIS analysis and products? <br />• What is the quality (scientific soundness) or reliability (ability to <br />replicate) of the data or other information used by EIS Team and <br />the FWS in their ESA review of the Program, and was it used in a <br />manner that is consistent with that level of quality or reliability? <br />• Are there additional data available that should be used in the <br />ESA/FWS Team analysis? <br />• Are there data, analysis, margin errors, etc., that, if corrected, <br />could result in different conclusions? <br />• Are there additional data that must be collected before valid <br />conclusions can be drawn on all or some of the issues? <br />The Consultant's review should identify the degree to which the EIS Team and <br />the FWS in their ESA review of the Program products or conclusions are <br />basically correct and scientifically supported. <br />Task 3. Independent Evaluation of Current Understanding <br />The Consultant will analyze the existing information identified in Task 1 and <br />identify the current level of understanding of channel narrowing or deepening, <br />sediment transport, and vegetative encroachment in and along the central Platte <br />River. The review should identify where certainties and uncertainties exist. <br />-7- <br />