Laserfiche WebLink
Messrs. Lochhead, Simpson, and Robotham g <br />Page 7. 2.4. Further Questions Concerning Pulse Flows <br />Comment: "How would the pulse flows during the spring affect young forage <br />fish ?" <br />A large number of riverine fish and aquatic ecosystem effects associated with <br />natural pulse flows are reported throughout the fishery science literature. <br />For example, the periods of spring pulse typically corresponds with spawning <br />periods of some riverine fishes. Because pulse flows have been an elemental <br />characteristic of the Platte River flow regime for as long as snow has fallen <br />on the Rocky Mountains in winter, melted in spring, and water flowed downhill, <br />it is reasonable to assume that the fishes native to the rivers of the <br />Missouri River drainage developed adaptations (physical, physiological, and <br />behavioral) to this flow regime. <br />Comment: "Are pulse flows the only way to provide for the hydrodynamics of <br />wet meadows, or are there other means ?" <br />Pulse flows are the only way known by <br />well as other physical and biological <br />ensured. However, the Service has no <br />possibilities for limited purposes. <br />water drains in selected managed area <br />successful wet meadow restoration and <br />which hydrodynamics of wet meadows, as <br />functions of the river system, can be <br />categorically dismissed all nonflow <br />or example, blocking manmade ground <br />may be one component important to <br />management. <br />Artificial methods likely would have narrow and limited applications to <br />achieving the effects of ecological functions, and at this stage also would be <br />highly experimental. Given the Service's responsibilities to manage <br />ecosystems under the Endangered Species Act and other Federal laws and given <br />the Memorandum of Agreement's stated objectives, the Service believes the — <br />pulse flows are ecologically fundamental, unless sound alternatives are <br />demonstrated. <br />There appears to be misconceptions or lack of understanding regarding the <br />Service's perspective on achieving flow - related biological objectives through <br />nonflow means. The Service has funded and participated in a number of <br />attempts at nonflow alternatives to habitat management and restoration. The <br />Service funded a substantial portion of the costs associated with use of a <br />hydraulic dredge by the Platte River Trust (Trust) to construct sandbar <br />nesting habitat for least terns and piping plovers. The Service funded and <br />participated with the Trust in experimental use of a high volume windmill on <br />Trust land as a means to evaluate the use of ground water pumping for <br />restoration of wet meadow habitat. The Service funded and participated in the <br />use and evaluation of temporary dams to back up flow in small side channels as <br />a means to raise ground water levels in adjacent meadows. To date and to the <br />best of the Service's knowledge, with the exception of dredging up sandbar <br />nesting habitat for least terns and piping plovers, the results of all <br />attempts to achieve flow - related objectives by nonflow means have been either <br />inconclusive or unsuccessful. <br />