Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY <br />THE PLATTE RIVER CHANNEL: HISTORYAND RESTORATION" <br />by <br />Peter J. Murphy and Timothy J. Randle <br />Hydraulic Engineers <br />The Department of the Interior, as part of its efforts to develop a cooperative, basinwide, <br />proposed recovery program for the whooping crane, piping plover, least tern, and pallid sturgeon, <br />has prepared a technical report describing the factors that have caused the Platte River channel to <br />narrow and habitat for the birds to be lost. It also presents options for offsetting those trends and <br />restoring river habitat. This report is based upon a review and analysis of more than a century of <br />field data from the river, going back to the earliest records of channel conditions, flow, and <br />sediment measurement. <br />The Causes of Channel Narrowing. <br />Over the last 150 years, storage and diversion of waters upstream from the Central Platte have <br />greatly reduced both springtime flows and the amount of sand carried by the river. Peak flows <br />have been reduced from roughly 20,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) to about 6,700 cfs, and the <br />sand load in the river has dropped by nearly 90 percent. This has allowed cottonwood and other <br />trees and shrubs to take over up to 80 -90 percent of the historically open and unvegetated <br />channel areas. Relatively few wide areas of the river and high sandbars remain for use by the <br />threatened and endangered species. <br />Four processes that have lead to narrowing are identified. <br />1. The reduction in annual peak flow: The large decrease in flow rates occurred over the <br />period 1860 -1960. The higher areas of the channel were abandoned by the river flow and <br />formed islands, and the total wetted channel width decreased significantly. Since the <br />flow -rate reductions extended downstream for hundreds of miles, so too did this channel <br />narrowing. The channel narrowing from this cause occurred during the same period that <br />the peak flows were reducing. At present (1960- 2000), the mean annual flows and annual <br />peak flows are no longer decreasing and channel narrowing from this cause is no longer <br />occurring. Further reductions in annual peak flow rates, should they occur, would <br />continue this channel narrowing effect into the future. <br />2. Colonization by vegetation: The exposed sandy areas of the channel abandoned over <br />the period 1860 -1960 were ripe for the rapid colonization by vegetation (grass, shrubs, <br />and trees). After a few decades, the banks of the narrow channels were covered with <br />mature vegetation. The roots of that vegetation stabilized the banks and prevented <br />erosion during subsequently higher flows. The large flood peaks of 1973 and 1983 did <br />not produce significant, sustained widening of river channel. Because of the dense <br />vegetation, high flows, when they occur, do not widen the channel, but merely deposit <br />more fine sand on top of the wooded islands and banks. <br />