Laserfiche WebLink
Scicntiflc'Cvahtatlon of Fliological Opinions on Endangorcd and Throntcncd rishcs In Rcport (2002) <br />nrrp:maw.n{r�,,� Cnnnnt4rrxrH9Zawlumintlb.Aami. Mp?flphr alMlZ Zl /r fns 1V¢Irnhal M x000 O nt S[ [recd all nphr. rmrvca <br />Contents <br />SUMMARY................................................ ........... ...... ........................ ......_ -1 <br />1. INTRODUCTION ....................................... .................. . . .. .. •. ......5 <br />2. EVALUATION OF THE BIOLOGICAL OPINION ON SHORTNOSE AND LOST RIVER <br />SUCKERS....................................................................... ..............................9 <br />3. EVALUATION OF THE BIOLOGICAL OPINION ON KLAMATH BASIN COHO <br />SALMON..... .................................................................. . ................. .... ...... ... 17 <br />4. CONCLUSIONS ............................... ............................... . .. .........................21 <br />S. REFERENCES ......................,............................... - -- .--........ .............................22 <br />6. APPENDIX. STATEMENT OF TASK .......................................... .............................25 <br />FIGURE 1 Map of the Upper Klamath River Basin showing surface waters and landmarks <br />mentioned in this report (modified from USFWS sources), 6 <br />FIGURE 2 Overview of monthly levels for Upper Klamath Lake proposed by USBR through <br />Its biological assessment of 2001, USFWS through Its biological opinion of 2001, <br />and observed conditions for the years 1960 —1998. Hydrologic categories used <br />by USBR In its proposals (dry years. critical dry years) are explained In the text. <br />Mean depths, excluding wetlands, corresponding to water levels are <br />approximately as follows (feet): 4137 = 3.5; 4138 = 4.0; 4139 = 4.8; 4140 = 5.7; <br />4141 = 6.6; 4142 = 7.6 (Welch and Burke 2001. Figure 2 -5), 11 <br />FIGURE 3 Historical record of level at the end of September for Upper Klamath Lake (from <br />USBR sources), 12 <br />FIGURE 4 Relationship of chlorophyll a and medlan August lake level in Upper Klamath <br />Lake between 1991 and 9998. Chlorophyll data are averages as reported by <br />Welch and Burke 20p1. Recruitment and mortality information Is as reported by <br />USFWS 2001,14 <br />FIGURE 5 Relative strength of year classes for endangered suckers as reconstructed from <br />survey of mass mortality in 1995. 1996, and 1997 (combined), 15 <br />FIGURE 6 Three flow regimes for the Klamath River below Iron Gate Dam: USBR proposed <br />(USBR 2001 b: minima for dry and critical years), historical mean minima for dry <br />and critical dry years, and RPA minimum flows from NMFS (2001). Hydrologic <br />categories used by USBR in its proposals (dry years, critical dry years) are <br />explained in the text, 19 <br />xii <br />966 -d BEO /El0 "d 9EZ -1 899899860E s3 nosu lvrIVN 100 -0106d X11 ZOOZ- 80 -93d <br />