My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resources Chairman James V. Hansen's Remarks for 02-16-02 Grand Island, NE Hearing
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Resources Chairman James V. Hansen's Remarks for 02-16-02 Grand Island, NE Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2013 2:58:14 PM
Creation date
3/4/2013 4:32:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
NE
CO
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/16/2002
Author
PRRIP
Title
ContinuedTestimony before the US House of Representatives Committee on Resources
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Nebraska has also established a clear system of water rights based upon the <br />uses of the water and the priority date of those uses. Creatively solving some of <br />the endangered species issues in the Platte Basin requires that we consider means <br />of flexibility within these rights, while at the same time protecting those rights and <br />uses for future generations. <br />As we speak, the legislature and my committee specifically, are considering <br />various pieces of legislation related to leasing and banking water rights, <br />conversion of water rights between uses, establishing a legal linkage between <br />ground water and surface water and so on. My committee has advanced a bill, LB <br />1023, to the full legislature for debate. This bill creates a Water Policy Task Force <br />which will examine five issues relating to water policy in Nebraska over the <br />course of eighteen months at a cost of $750,000.00. <br />While the state was likely to have considered these issues in its own time <br />frame, the Cooperative Agreement discussions are forcing us into the situation of <br />considering many of these issues in a compressed time frame. While these issues <br />are important to resolving endangered species issues in the context of the <br />Cooperative Agreement, it is more important that the legislature of the state <br />consider very carefully the long term effects that any of these actions might have. <br />The legislature will not jeopardize the constitutional rights of our citizens or our <br />agricultural economy in Nebraska because of rushed or ill- considered measures. <br />That being said, let me extend my support to the Cooperative Agreement <br />process. A cooperative process among the states and the federal government — let <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.