My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Erosion, Transport and Deposition Process
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Erosion, Transport and Deposition Process
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2013 3:53:37 PM
Creation date
3/4/2013 1:49:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Cooperative Agreement [CA]; aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program [PRRIP])
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Title
Budget and Schedule Estimate Details - Technical Committee
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Budget
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Additional Study Questions <br />1 How much sand augmentation is needed to offset any given level of channel narrowing and deepening? <br />2 To what extent will a vegetation - removal flow and /or a sand - bar - building flow cause or increase channel bed degradation /incision? <br />3 What depth, velocity, duration, timing, frequency, and magnitude of flow are required to (a) prevent establishment of, or (b) remove vegetation? <br />4 What consequences would reduced winter flows have on channel geometry and vegetation? <br />5 What age and density of existing vegetation can be removed with pulse flows? <br />6 What level of drought (frequency and magnitude) would need to occur to reduce the environmental account water to the point that vegetation significantly <br />recolonizes cleared areas of the channel? <br />7 Does the mechanical removal of vegetation kill vegetation or is there sufficient root mass that survives resulting in rejuvenated vegetation and /or disperses <br />live plant material that subsequently re -roots when deposited again by flow? <br />8 What is the effectiveness of island vegetation removal by mechanical means in regard to both beneficial aspects as well as any potential adverse <br />consequences such as excessive sand deposition, re- establishment of vegetation, and establishment of undesirable plants within and downstream of <br />treated areas? <br />9 What changes are anticipated in the sand budget and channel morphology under potential sand augmentation scenarios? <br />10 To what extent will the release of sand into the river from island clearing and lowering, or from direct sand augmentation, potentially cause aggradation or <br />increased flooding problems? <br />11 How high can sand bars be developed using flow and sediment transport (under the current flow and sediment regime and under a vegetation removal /bar <br />building regime — with and without direct sand augmentation)? <br />12 Can velocities of flow sufficient to remove vegetation from the tops of bars also be sufficiently low to allow deposition of sand to build the bars higher? <br />13 What conclusions regarding sand bar restoration can be derived from re- evaluation of the extensive existing tern and plover survey data, and what <br />increment of additional data could reduce or eliminate uncertainties in sand bar ecology? <br />14 Is the use of woody debris, as a flow obstruction, an effective method for building sandbars that provide suitable nesting habitat for terns and plovers? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.