Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Paul Tebbel 3 <br />monitoring and research remain unresolved in the document. Because significant ecosystem <br />processes such as sediment transport, nutrient flow, and water temperature function across the <br />entire drainage basin, we believe the Program should consider the entire geologic and hydrologic <br />basin from the Platte River tributaries to the Missouri River confluence for purposes of <br />monitoring select ecosystem processes. <br />In addition, the identification of "other basin - associated species" should be included as a list in <br />the document. Where Program activities may adversely affect these species, monitoring activities <br />should be considered to understand the effects of the Program on their populations and habitats. <br />This is an important monitoring function in consideration of one of the major Program purposes <br />which is to help prevent the need to list more basin associated species pursuant to the <br />Endangered Species Act. The focus of monitoring and research should be on species and <br />habitats in the central Platte River, however other geographic areas and other species may need <br />to be considered. When possible, the IMRC should consider and incorporate monitoring and <br />research being done by other agencies and organizations. <br />Reporting and Communication <br />The document lacks clear explanation of how the "adaptive loop" will be closed through <br />communication between management, monitoring, and research. There should be more <br />discussion of the process of annual reporting and the development and testing of new <br />"management experiments" through Program management. How will the research and <br />monitoring efforts, reporting the results of past management, be coordinated with future actions <br />including land acquisition and management, and flow management? As the central focus of the <br />adaptive management process in the Program, this report must include more extensive <br />explanation of this crucial step in the evolutionary process of Program management. <br />Budge <br />The estimated budgets section should be removed from the IMRC document. Budget estimates <br />were initially discussed and included for the benefit of the Governance Committee and do not <br />belong in the IMRC document. They represent a cursory effort to estimate monitoring and <br />research costs. Until a more objective and deliberative process is carried out to produce these <br />numbers, we believe that they may be more misleading than useful. This section may, however, <br />be added as supplemental information accompanying the document. It will be important to <br />develop a useful monitoring and research program that is as cost effective as possible. <br />Conclusion <br />The document currently provides a substantial foundation for developing a working adaptive <br />management program for Platte River endangered species recovery. While our staffs had a <br />significant number of relatively minor substantive and editorial comments on the document, we <br />