My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Report on the Platte River Basin, Nebraska Level B Study
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Report on the Platte River Basin, Nebraska Level B Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 12:40:16 PM
Creation date
2/27/2013 4:57:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
NE
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/1/1976
Author
Missouri River Basin Commission
Title
Report on the Platte River Basin, Nebraska Level B Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
10 <br />made for consideration of suggested potential <br />programs. Reports on both of these activities were <br />prepared and are available on a limited basis. <br />A study of nonpoint pollution caused by runoff <br />from an agricultural area was also initiated as part <br />of this study. Although a late start on data collec- <br />tion and lack of sufficient runoff the first summer <br />precluded input to this study, the activity is being <br />continued by the University of Nebraska. <br />PUBLIC PARTICIPATION <br />Public participation was invited at all stages of <br />study. The Plan of Study was reviewed with inter- <br />ested representatives of public agencies and the <br />public -at -large early in the study period. Sugges- <br />tions for membership on citizens' advisory com- <br />mittees were made and utilized in establishment of <br />such committees. <br />Study participants met with these citizen com- <br />mittees on a regular basis and presented proce- <br />dures, preliminary study results, and alternatives <br />for consideration and review as they were <br />developed. Task forces also held meetings in dif- <br />ferent areas of the basin to determine local needs <br />and concerns. <br />Preliminary plans were reviewed by the planning <br />board, planning team, and task force leaders as well <br />as citizens' advisory committee members. Follow- <br />ing these reviews, the preliminary plans were <br />presented to the public at 12 meetings across the <br />basin attended by approximately 1000 people. <br />Comments made and questions raised were con- <br />sidered and incorporated in the draft Recom- <br />mended Plan where possible, but incorporation was <br />sometimes constrained by the procedures and <br />principles established at the beginning of the study. <br />The draft Recommended Plan was presented at <br />six public meetings attended by about 560 people <br />before the field draft report was presented to the <br />MRBC. Comments received at those meetings were <br />considered and accommodated, where possible, in <br />the field draft report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.