Laserfiche WebLink
On July 1, 1997, the Governors of Nebraska, Wyoming, and Colorado, and the Secretary of <br />the Interior signed a "Cooperative Agreement for Platte River Research and Other Efforts <br />Relating to Endangered Species Habitats Along the Central Platte River, Nebraska" (CA). <br />FWS issued a final Biological Opinion in July 1997 that transmitted the CA and an <br />"Agreement in Principle for License Conditions for Project Nos. 1417 and 1835" (AP). <br />The final Biological Opinion recommended a new RPA that is integrated with the basin - <br />wide CA, is consistent with the AP, and envisions ultimate implementation of a basin -wide <br />program for recovery of federally listed species along the central Platte River. <br />On January 15, 1998, the parties filed an "Agreement on All Issues Reached in FERC Trial <br />Staff Settlement Meetings" (AAI), in which the Trust, the National Audubon Society, the <br />Nebraska Wildlife Federation, the Sierra Club, and American Rivers agreed to the AP as <br />modified and supplemented by the AAI. On May 15, 1998, the parties filed an "Offer of <br />Settlement" proposing that this relicensing proceeding be settled based on the terms and <br />provisions of the AAI. The Offer of Settlement signatories are Central, NPPD, Interior, the <br />State of Colorado, the State of Wyoming, the National Audubon Society, the Trust, <br />American Rivers, the Nebraska Wildlife Federation, and the Sierra Club. The Nebraska <br />Water Users are also a party to the settlement, and the State of Nebraska has endorsed it. <br />1.4 PRINCIPAL RESOURCE CONSIDERATIONS <br />In considering the issuance of a license, the Commission accounts for multiple aspects of <br />the public interest: (1) potential benefits to interstate or foreign commerce; (2) use of the <br />site's hydroelectric potential; (3) adequate protection, mitigation, and enhancement of fish <br />and wildlife (including their spawning grounds and habitat); and (4) other beneficial public <br />uses, including energy conservation, irrigation, flood control, water supply, recreational <br />opportunities, and other aspects of environmental quality. In weighing the relative <br />importance of these various factors, the Commission is required by law to give equal <br />consideration to both developmental and nondevelopmental values. <br />The Commission staff has concluded, based on public, agency, and intervenor comments <br />during the EIS scoping, that there are four principal resource objectives relevant to the <br />licensing of the Kingsley Dam and Keystone/North Platte projects: <br />• provision of adequate irrigation water to sustain agricultural production on total <br />average currently served; <br />• protection and enhancement of significant wildlife and plant species, and the <br />aquatic and riparian habitats that support them; <br />• use of the projects' electric power generation potential; and <br />• maintenance of reservoir -based recreational opportunities available at Lake <br />McConaughy. <br />1 -4 <br />