My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II Appendix K, Part 1
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume II Appendix K, Part 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:47:00 PM
Creation date
2/27/2013 1:09:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
NE
Basin
North Platte
Date
7/1/1998
Author
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Office of Hydropower Licensing
Title
Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) - Volume II, Appendix K, Part 1 - Kingsley Dam (FERC Project No. 1417) and North Platte/Keystone Dam (FERC Project No. 1835) Projects, Nebraska, FERC/FEIS-0063
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
551
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7C <br />COMMENTS OF CENTRAL NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER AND <br />IRRIGATION DISTRICT <br />underestimating the cost of Rainwater Basin development by <br />$4,110,000. The total amount by which the Staff understated <br />the costs of new programs is $12.4 million in initial and <br />annual recurring costs.921 These figures represent only the <br />errors which Central can now identify. The Staff is also <br />asking Central to absorb the substantial risk that over the <br />thirty -year license term, the Staff's estimates -- or <br />Central's own -- will prove inaccurate. The potential <br />impacts of this risk are highly significant if the Staff <br />expects Central to accept license conditions estimated to <br />incur costs to the full extent of Central's ability to pay. <br />In addition to underestimating the full burden of items <br />it attempted to cost, the Staff has proposed that the <br />Districts engage in a number of other activities to which <br />the Staff failed to assign any cost at all. Some, such as <br />developing procedures to implement the Nebraska State Plan <br />and helping restock Lake McConaughy after low storage years, <br />appear to be mere omissions, and Central estimates their <br />costs to be $1,360,000.'a Others, such as the <br />implementation of the Conservation Program, are unknown -- <br />but not insubstantial. In accounting for the costs of <br />alternatives, the Staff must include in its total the very <br />real increased maintenance costs associated with new flow <br />§2 Initial costs plus annual recurring costs escalated <br />at S% and discounted at 8 %. <br />' —a Vol. 2, Ch. IV, App. IV -B. <br />- 39 - <br />RESPONSES TO CENTRAL NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER AND <br />IRRIGATION DISTRICT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.