My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ground Water and River Flow Analysis
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Ground Water and River Flow Analysis
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2013 4:26:58 PM
Creation date
2/25/2013 4:18:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
5/1/2001
Author
by Glen Sanders Bureau of Reclamation Denver Office Technical Service Center
Title
Ground Water and River Flow Analyses
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
20 , <br />• Predictability diminishes rapidly further away from the river on average: 78 percent <br />at 700 feet, 38 percent at 1,000 feet, and 16 percent beyond 10,000 feet. <br />• In the Elm Creek transect, the groundwater mound under the Central Nebraska Public <br />Power and Irrigation District apparently exerts more control over groundwater , <br />movement and elevation than the Platte River. <br />Ground water levels within a few hundred feet of the river are influenced by river <br />elevation changes. Ground water levels more than 1,000 feet from the river appear to <br />be more closely related to precipitation. <br />RESULTS OF CURRENT YEAR MONITORING <br />As of July 5, 2000, the current year monitoring program has produced results that are <br />consistent with those of the 1999 monitoring. River levels in March and April were very <br />similar for the two years. May 1999 saw higher river elevations, but they subsided by the <br />end of the month to levels comparable to 2000 flows. However, beginning in mid June <br />2000, river flows began to decline to more normal summertime flows of less than <br />1,000 cfs. These low flows never occurred in 1999. <br />Precipitation beginning in mid April 1999 was fairly significant, whereas the 2000 <br />precipitation was minimal up to mid June, except for two moderate events of less than <br />1 inch at each transect. Larger rains ranging from 1 to 6 inches fell on June 12 at the <br />Minden transect, on June 19 to Elm Creek and Minden transects, and on July 3 and 4 to <br />all the transects. No rains greater than 2 inches were measured at any of the locations in <br />1999. <br />The significant differences between the years in river level and precipitation patterns <br />provide an opportunity to study the interrelationships among river level, precipitation <br />patterns, and ground water levels under distinctly different circumstances for the 2 years. <br />In 2000, the wells that are within 200 feet of the river bank track the river very closely, <br />as would be expected. Wells farther from the river appear to be more independent of the M <br />river. For instance, the river at the Elm Creek transects underwent a series of 6 -inch <br />fluctuations, each about 1 week duration, during March. At the same time, the water <br />surface in well 8- 19 -3ABB (1 /z miles from the river) averaged 2 feet higher than the river I <br />and rose about 1 -inch on a straight line. <br />Several wells in the Alda and Minden transects were monitored in both years (figure 8). <br />Several precipitation events in 1999 appeared to produce rises in the water surface in the <br />wells. In the absence of precipitation in 2000, the wells do not display such rises. For <br />Ground Water and River Flow Analyses <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.