My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ground Water and River Flow Analysis
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
Ground Water and River Flow Analysis
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2013 4:26:58 PM
Creation date
2/25/2013 4:18:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
5/1/2001
Author
by Glen Sanders Bureau of Reclamation Denver Office Technical Service Center
Title
Ground Water and River Flow Analyses
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />1 <br />[I <br />1 <br />1 <br />1� <br />�l <br />17 <br />RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PRECIPITATION, <br />RIVER STAGE, AND GROUND WATER LEVELS <br />Examining the data to determine these relationships among precipitation, ground water <br />levels, and river levels took several forms. Eventually, two approaches were judged to be <br />the most technically supportable: <br />• Daily analysis. —A critical day -by -day analysis of the fluctuations at individual wells <br />superimposed on the river elevations at the well transect location. <br />• Statistical analysis.— Correlation of rises and falls in the water levels at the wells <br />and at the river gauges. <br />RESULTS OF DAILY ANALYSIS <br />Hydrographs of several wells in the Minden transects and in the Alda transects were <br />superimposed on the river hydrograph and the relative gains and losses on a day -by -day <br />basis were examined. The wells were selected to represent various distances from the <br />river. Precipitation data was also displayed. Each significant change in ground water <br />level was studied to determine whether the water table was responding to changes in the <br />river, to precipitation, or to some other factor. <br />This analysis also looked at the correlation factor between the water level in the well and <br />the river stage (water level) and at the bank storage analysis of how the well would <br />respond to the actual changes that occurred in the river elevation. This analysis is <br />provided in appendix B. <br />Several patterns developed in the course of this analysis: <br />• The correlation factor consistently decreased as the distance from the well to the <br />river increased. <br />The water table is far <br />more responsive to <br />precipitation than to <br />changes in the river <br />stage at all wells located <br />more than one half mile <br />from the river. <br />• The bank storage analysis accurately predicted the water <br />table changes resulting from river stage changes in many <br />instances. There were no instances where the bank <br />storage analysis was found to be in error. <br />• The water level in all wells responded to precipitation in <br />a fairly predictable pattern, although the magnitude of <br />change was sometimes out of proportion to the <br />precipitation amount. <br />Ground Water and River Flow Analyses <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.