Laserfiche WebLink
N <br />percent in the Bridger Range (Montana) and Climax I and II (central Colorado) Experiments were used. <br />This increase combined with a storm seedability factor of 0.45, estimated from limited cloud modeling <br />with the Colorado State University three - dimensional Regional Atmospheric Modeling System, yielded a <br />precipitation seasonal increase of 11.25 percent, the value used to estimate headwaters additional <br />precipitation. <br />Estimates of water volume increases were made with an approximate 28 percent areal coverage of the <br />Headwaters Region resulting from use of a sample seeding design (shown in figure 4.1) and equipment <br />placement for 55 seeding devices. This number of devices was obtained from brief study of terrain <br />digital elevation data, wilderness area locations, estimated seeding plume widths and nonlocal winds, and <br />is strictly a preliminary. assessment. Applying the 11.25 percent increase to average winter precipitation <br />in the Headwaters Region yielded an additional 60,000 acre -feet of water in the areas above 9000 feet in <br />elevation covered by the seeding plumes of the 55 seeding devices. For the dry year (50 percent of <br />normal precipitation), seeding yielded an additional 30,000 acre -feet, and the seeded wet year produced <br />90,000 additional acre -feet (150 percent of normal precipitation). The increases grow to the respective <br />85,000, 43,000, and 128,000 acre -feet of water when the areal coverage by seeding devices is increased <br />to 40 percent through possible seeding design improvements. The design phase of the program will <br />produce a proper seeding device siting and consequently, seeding areal coverage. These figures are not <br />adjusted for possibly differing seeding opportunity from one year type to another. Additionally, they do <br />not incorporate effects of cloud seeding suspension criteria (likely to mostly affect results in wet years) <br />that will need to become a component of the program's environmental awareness. <br />The annual cost of the first year of operational seeding is estimated at $1,025,000 and the tenth year at <br />$1,330,000 using a 3 percent inflation factor per succeeding year. The estimated 10 -year cost of <br />operations is $11,716,000. Assuming 55 cloud treatment devices are used in seeding, the average annual <br />cost of operations per seeding device is $21,300. This figure includes annual costs for all operational <br />tasks, assuming automated conduct of cloud seeding, largely automated collection of field data, no <br />observations by aircraft or local scanning radar. Weather service routine radar information from the <br />network's Grand Mesa Colorado system would be available. Cost estimates would be revisited at the end <br />of the design phase. <br />The first year of the design phase will be devoted to planning, weather and cloud modeling, <br />environmental compliance and permitting, study site selection for the design phase, preliminary <br />surveying of the Headwaters Region, and contract procurement. The following two years will entail <br />field data collection for two winters, data analysis, additional weather and cloud modeling, equipment <br />specification and siting determination, environmental compliance, and public involvement. The cost of <br />conducting the design phase effort, including environmental compliance estimated at $275,000, but short <br />of equipment costs, is $1,498,000 for the three years. Total equipment costs are estimated at $1,800,000. <br />The seeding equipment is estimated at $1,369,000. <br />Weather modification programs must comply with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) <br />requirements if they include financial or regulatory participation by the Federal Government, or affect <br />lands managed by Federal agencies. The proposed program faces compliance for the design phase <br />possibly at a low complexity level, but because precipitation increases are expected in the operational <br />seeding phase, compliance for it may be at a moderate to high complexity level requiring data collection <br />and analysis. No cloud seeding or significant disturbance of ground or vegetation can occur until NEPA <br />requirements are met. An interdisciplinary team of experts will be needed. Public involvement will be <br />vii <br />