My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Platte River Wetland Hydrology Study
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Platte River Wetland Hydrology Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:58 PM
Creation date
2/25/2013 1:48:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
WY
NE
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/28/1994
Author
Thomas A. Wesche, Quentin D. Skinner, and Robert J. Henszey - Department of Range Management and Wyoming Water Resources Center, University of Wyoming, Laramie
Title
Platte River Wetland Hydrology Study WWRC-94-07
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
involved. This groundwater recession appeared to fit an exponential decay curve described by <br />the following equation (Viessman et al. 1977): <br />APIs = K(APIt_d + Pt <br />where <br />APIs = antecedent precipitation index for the current time period <br />APIt_1 = antecedent precipitation index from the previous time period (assumed = 0 at <br />the start) <br />K = recession constant, empirically derived <br />Pt = total precipitation for the current time period <br />() <br />The recession constant K is normally reported in the range of 0.85 to 0.98 for modeling soil <br />moisture, with higher values approaching an additive effect for precipitation. For modeling <br />the water table recession at Crane Meadows, however, a value of 0.60 provided the best fit to <br />the data. Increasing K from 0.5 to 0.9 increased the correlation with the groundwater level, <br />but it also increased the correlation with the river stage. One notable exception to this <br />observation was for the month of April, when increasing K seemed to dramatically increase the <br />correlation with the groundwater level while also decreasing the correlation with the river <br />stage. Different values of K were tried for each month, but a fixed value of 0.60 consistently <br />improved the correlation with the groundwater level while minimizing the increased correlation <br />with the river stage. Since 0.60 fit the data best and provided the best balance between <br />correlations, a fixed value of 0.60 was used for all analysis. <br />River stage and groundwater levels were rescaled by subtracting a constant to reduce <br />their range compared to their mean, (e.g., instead of using the elevation above sea level, the <br />elevation was adjusted by subtracting a constant such as 1,800 ft). PROC CORR (SAS <br />Institute Inc. 1985a) was used to calculate the correlations. <br />Missing Data Estimation <br />Missing data for precipitation, mean daily groundwater elevations, and river stage were <br />estimated to provide a complete record of continuous hydrologic data and to calculate the <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.