My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Platte River Wetland Hydrology Study
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Platte River Wetland Hydrology Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:58 PM
Creation date
2/25/2013 1:48:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program or PRRIP)
State
WY
NE
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/28/1994
Author
Thomas A. Wesche, Quentin D. Skinner, and Robert J. Henszey - Department of Range Management and Wyoming Water Resources Center, University of Wyoming, Laramie
Title
Platte River Wetland Hydrology Study WWRC-94-07
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUND4ARY <br />While the importance of wetlands for native plants and wildlife has been recognized, <br />rolouth_at maintains these areas_ is poorly understood. To address this knowledge gap <br />sect Team began a stu v in 1988 to examine the seasonal relationships between wet <br />irrigation. Threesites along the Platte River between Lexington and Grand slann ; <br />Nebraska, were selected for the study. This research was initially funded by U.S. Fish and <br />Wildlife Service, with continuation funding provided by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and <br />parts of the analysis funded by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. <br />To accomplish our analysis we: 1) Described the continuous hydrologic and soil <br />temperatures; 2) Developed bo_;,x„plot groundwater and river -stage h drora h�s; 3) Developed <br />depth -to- groundwater and river stage duration curves; 4) Determined the relationship between <br />river stage and river flow; 5) Present -M- ro s'- valley groundwater -level transects; <br />6) Developed groundwater -level contours for each site; 7) Developed depth -to- groundwater <br />maps for a representative area at each site; 8) Described the apparent effective rooting depth <br />for plants affecting the water table level; 9) Examined the effect of adjacent groundwater <br />withdrawal for irrigation; and 10) Separated the influence of river stage, precipitation, and <br />evapotranspiration on wet - meadow Qroun water levels. <br />Continuous hydrologic and soil temperatures were plotted by water year to show the <br />'real -time' relationships. Boxplot hydrographs and depth -to- groundwater duration curve <br />were generated from the contmuou�ifv mean groundwater deaths and river stage_ The be <br />curves are cumulative ITeguen clistriputions that snow the percent of time a particular depth <br />or stage Vas equaled or above that level for a perio Zdt spec ie . L—iffe-ar regression was use <br />to determine relationship een the river stage at a site and the river flow at an adjacent <br />USGS gaging station. Groundwater levels for dates selected to represent the lowest and <br />highest periodic measurements, and a median level for spring and summer, were used for the <br />cross - valley transects, groundwater -level contours at each site, and the depth -to- groundwater <br />maps for selected areas at each site. The effective plant rooting depth was determined by <br />plotting the observed evapotranspiration from the water table versus the depth to the water <br />table. Continuous plots of groundwater, precipitation, and periods of pumping for adjacent <br />irrigation were examined for possible groundwater fluctuations caused by pumping. <br />Correlation analysis was used to separate the effects of river stage, precipitation, and <br />evapotranspiration on the groundwater level. <br />The continuous data and the box -plot hydrographs showed that the median groundwater <br />levels typically peaked by March, and then declined through September. Recharge began in <br />October and varied between a gradual recharge over the winter for the drier wells, to a <br />relatively rapid recharge following plant senescence in the fall at the wetter sites. The duration <br />curves showed that the water table was within 0.5 ft of the surface 0 %, < 1 %, and 56 -95 % of <br />the time for Elm Creek, Rowe Sanctuary, and for the two wettest wells at Crane Meadows, <br />respectively, for February through April. Reasonably good relationships were developed <br />between the river stage and river flow for Rowe Sanctuary and Crane Meadows, but the <br />relationship was poor at Elm Creek because the river only enters the Elm Creek channel at <br />high flow. Interpretation of the groundwater profile next to Rowe Sanctuary and Crane <br />Meadows was confounded because the cross - valley transects were not oriented perpendicular <br />ii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.