Laserfiche WebLink
lof <br />On Fool Creek the annual water yield increase ranged <br />from 1.6 inches in the very dry year of 1963 to 6.4 <br />inches in the exceptionally wet year of 1957 (Figure <br />2.4). Figure 2.5 shows that the increase in annual water <br />yields observed at Fool Creek generally is proportional <br />to the estimated runoff in the absence of any forest <br />harvest. Since annual runoff is directly proportional to <br />the annual precipitation, this means that the increase in <br />runoff due to forest harvest in any given year is directly <br />proportional to annual precipitation. In the case of Fool <br />Creek, approximately 40% of the observed increase in <br />annual water yields can be attributed to the variation <br />in the amount of SWE on 1 April (Troendle and King, <br />1985). The remaining scatter in Figure 1 can be attrib- <br />uted to differences in seasonal precipitation, snowpack <br />sublimation, and numerous other factors that affect the <br />amount of runoff. <br />The tendency to have larger water yield increases in <br />wetter years was also apparent in the Wagon Wheel <br />Gap study. Here the water yield increase in a wet year <br />was twice as large in an average year, and the water <br />yield increase dropped to zero in years with below nor- <br />mal precipitation (Bates and Henry, 1928). A series of <br />paired- watershed studies on ponderosa pine stands in <br />Arizona also showed that forest harvest caused much <br />25 <br />20 <br />U <br />15 <br />c <br />c° 10 <br />Q! <br />5 <br />0 <br />larger increases in water yields in wet years than dry <br />years (Baker, 1986). <br />2.2.4. Rate of hydrologic recovery. <br />The values in Table 2.1 and the water yield increases <br />discussed to this point all represent the average change <br />that would be expected in the first year after harvest. In <br />the absence of any other management activities, these <br />increases in runoff will decline over time with for- <br />est regrowth (Figure 2.6) (Troendle and King, 1985). <br />Colorado's relatively cold, dry climate means that forest <br />regrowth is slow relative to most other areas, and one <br />would therefore expect slower hydrologic recovery rates. <br />The long -term snowpack and streamflow records from <br />the FEF allow a more rigorous quantification of hydro- <br />logic recovery in the sub - alpine forest than most other <br />areas (e.g., Troendle and King, 1985). These basin -scale <br />hydrologic data are complemented by more detailed <br />studies on the rate at which leaf area, basal area, and <br />other key characteristics recover following forest harvest <br />(e.g., Kaufmann, 1985). <br />Since the Wagon Wheel Gap study was only monitored <br />for seven years after harvest (Bates and Henry, 1928), <br />the longest - running paired - catchment study is the Fool <br />Creek experiment. After forty years annual water yields <br />1956 1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 <br />Year <br />Figure 2.4. Natural and increase in water yields by year for the Fool Creek catchment for the first 27 years after <br />harvest. <br />11 <br />