Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 2 <br />Effects of Forest Management on Runoff <br />2.1. Introduction <br />Colorado is relatively fortunate with respect to the <br />amount of scientific research that has been conducted on <br />the relationships between forest management and runoff. <br />The first paired- watershed experiment in the world was <br />conducted at Wagon Wheel Gap in southern Colorado in <br />the early 1900s, and this was followed by a long series of <br />studies designed to more rigorously document the effects <br />of forest harvest on annual water yields, the size of peak <br />flows, low flows, and, to a lesser extent, water quality. <br />Many of the most relevant studies have been conducted <br />on the Fraser Experimental Forest (FEF) northwest of <br />Winter Park, Colorado (Figure 2.1) (Alexander et al., <br />1985; Alexander, 1987). This was established in 1937, <br />and for the last 60 years the FEF has been the pre -emi- <br />nent center for forest hydrology research in the central <br />Rocky Mountains. Similarly, the Manitou Experimental <br />Forest has been the site of numerous plot and water- <br />shed -scale studies in the ponderosa pine and mixed <br />conifer zone (Figure 2) (e.g., Berndt, 1960; Gary, 1975). <br />Information relevant to Colorado can also be drawn <br />from watershed studies in states with similar conditions <br />(e.g., Arizona, Idaho, Wyoming, and Utah), and a much <br />broader pool of forest hydrology research conducted in <br />other areas. Information from all of these sources is used <br />in this report. The first three sections of this chapter sum- <br />marize existing knowledge on the effects of vegetation <br />management on annual water yields, the size of peak <br />flows, and the size of low flows. The next two sections of <br />this chapter respectively review the effects of roads and <br />fires on runoff. The final section in this chapter discusses <br />the extent to which results from plot or small watershed <br />studies can be extrapolated to larger areas, and the mag- <br />nitude of changes in runoff that might be expected in <br />large watersheds. Since forest harvest is the primary <br />technique used to investigate the relationship between <br />forests and water, this necessarily is the primary focus <br />of this chapter. The removal of forest cover by insects, <br />disease, or windthrow generally should have a similar <br />effect, but the difficulty of conducting controlled ex- <br />periments and the paucity of data precludes a detailed, <br />quantitative review of the effects of these other types of <br />disturbance on runoff and water quality. Similarly, there <br />Saratoga 0 CC V� yoming Nebraska <br />E <br />Fort <br />Collinse C <br />F <br />n <br />FEF Denver L <br />Glenwood 1 -70 <br />Springs <br />MEF <br />Colorado <br />Colorado Springs <br />Pueblo <br />MG 1 -25 <br />Durango <br />: xperimental Sites <br />oon Creek (CC) <br />raser Experimental Forest (FEF) <br />7anitou Experimental Forest NEF) <br />Vagon Wheel Gap (WWG) <br />N <br />0 50 <br />I � <br />100 <br />I <br />km <br />0 25 50 miles <br />I <br />Figure 2.1. Location of experimental forests in Colorado and selected paired watershed experiments. <br />