My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
The Mountain Geologist
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
The Mountain Geologist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 10:47:07 AM
Creation date
2/22/2013 1:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2004
Title
The Mountain Geologist
Author
Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists
Description
October 2004, Volume 41, Number 4
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Preface <br />This special issue of The Mountain Geologist explores the distribution, geology, and legal <br />framework of the bedrock aquifers in the Denver Basin. As summarized by Topper, these <br />aquifers occur in sedimentary rocks ranging from the Fox Hills Sandstone up through the <br />Denver Formation, strata deposited in settings that varied from shallow -water marine <br />through fluvial. Groundwater occurs within pore spaces in these rocks, and the distribution <br />of porosity and permeability reflects the stratigraphic characteristics of the environments of <br />deposition; hence, aquifer characterization is a geologic challenge. <br />This issue gathers threads of ongoing research to add to our current knowledge base <br />pertaining to these aquifers. As pointed out by Novotny and Sanford, much of the water <br />consumed in Douglas County is over 30,000 years old. This vintage water is administered <br />by a well -worn system as described by Graham and VanSlyke. Studies of vertical permeabil- <br />ity reported by Barkmann serve to emphasize that very significant barriers to fluid -flow are <br />common in the Basin and the aquifers are both layered and compartmentalized. Aquifer <br />studies such as those by Kittleson and Raynolds define the containers or reservoirs, while <br />innovative drilling techniques such as those reported by Jehn - Dellaport may be used to <br />accelerate short -term water production rates. <br />Colorado spans territory referred to as the Great American Desert; only by dint of our <br />engineering skills have we moved water across mountains and stored spring snow -melt so <br />as to be able to water our crops and slake the thirst of our cities. Over 80% of surface <br />water is used for irrigated agricultural production in rural Colorado. In the urbanizing Den- <br />ver Basin, groundwater is a finite resource and we are depleting our reserves. Nonetheless, <br />availability of potable water may not be a significant near -term constraint on population <br />growth in the Front Range area of Colorado, as we will simply allocate more funds to redi- <br />rect agricultural water to our urban and suburban needs. <br />As the Front Range develops the water - transfer and storage facilities to redistribute sur- <br />face water resources, the geologic community will be called upon to provide a better <br />understanding of aquifer characteristics so as to improve predictive models of aquifer per- <br />formance. Increased demand for water injection and storage within aquifers will require an <br />improved understanding of subsurface rock distribution and fluid flow patterns. The RMAG <br />community is especially qualified to take a proactive role in helping to interpret and con- <br />vey these complex aquifer issues to the public. <br />Bob Raynolds <br />Michele Reynolds, <br />Guest Editors <br />The Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists vi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.