My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
The Mountain Geologist
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
The Mountain Geologist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 10:47:07 AM
Creation date
2/22/2013 1:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2004
Title
The Mountain Geologist
Author
Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists
Description
October 2004, Volume 41, Number 4
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Development of the Regulatory Framework for Denver Basin Aquifers' <br />GLENN GRAHAM2,3 <br />GEORGE VANSLYKE2,3 <br />1. Manuscript received July 8, 2004; Accepted July 24, 2004 <br />2. Consulting Groundwater Geologist <br />3. Formerly with the Colorado Division of Water Resources <br />ABSTRACT <br />The resource potential of the Denver Basin aquifers was recognized as early as the 1880s, but devel- <br />opment, regulation and administration of Colorado's groundwater did not begin until 1959, and regula- <br />tions specific to the Denver Basin were not implemented until over 100 years later, in 1985. <br />The Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDWR) began an appraisal of the Denver Basin bedrock <br />aquifers in the fall of 1970. This study resulted in the 1976 publication Ground Water Resources of the <br />Bedrock Aquifers of the Denver Basin Colorado by John C. Romero. More detailed work in the late 1970s <br />and early 1980s by the Division of Water Resources and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) <br />formed the technical base for the promulgation of the Denver Basin Rules and Regulations mandated by <br />Senate Bill 5, in 1985. <br />Population growth along the Front Range in the 1970s came with increasing reliance on groundwater <br />contained in the bedrock aquifers. Projected increasing water demands based on continued growth <br />caused concerned individuals and organizations to raise questions about long -term water supplies in <br />general, and on the wisdom of depending on a finite groundwater source in particular. The voicing of <br />these concerns resulted in the creation of a Ground Water Task Group. The group was comprised of <br />water attorneys, members of the water rights and engineering consulting community, and staff of the <br />CDWR. The group was to identify the resource and make recommendations for the development of <br />groundwater from bedrock aquifers. <br />As a result of the work done by the task group, a Ground Water Legislation Committee was formed <br />in 1983 to propose laws that would guide the development of groundwater in bedrock aquifers. Particu- <br />lar attention was to be given to that part of the resource identified as nontributary groundwater, which <br />had been loosely defined as groundwater not in hydraulic connection with waters of the surface. In <br />some parts of the state, any groundwater stored in bedrock type aquifers located more than about 150 <br />feet below the surface was considered nontributary groundwater. Two years later, the Colorado General <br />Assembly enacted Senate Bill 85 -5, An Act for the Administration of Water. In response to this legislative <br />mandate, the CDWR developed the Denver Basin Model utilizing MODFLOW, and published the Denver <br />Basin Atlas maps. These data sets have remained essentially unchanged since 1988. <br />At the present time there are two coordinated efforts examining the currently available data specific <br />to the Denver Basin bedrock aquifers. Camp Dresser McKee (CDM) and the USGS are identifying and <br />compiling aquifer parameter data to be used in an upgraded groundwater model of the bedrock aquifers <br />and associated alluvial aquifers. <br />INTRODUCTION .........................154 CURRENT STUDIES .....................158 <br />HYDROGEOLOGIC SETTING ................154 CONCLUSIONS ........................159 <br />REGULATORY HISTORY ....................155 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................159 <br />REFERENCES ...........................160 <br />The Mountain Geologist, Vol. 41, No. 4 (October 2004), p 153 -160 153 The Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.