My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Headwaters Summer 2006
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Headwaters Summer 2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 10:51:46 AM
Creation date
2/22/2013 12:35:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2006
Title
Headwaters
Author
Colorado Foundation for Water Education
Description
The Groundwater Puzzle
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
exactly how much profit local farmers <br />made in 2004 raising corn in northeast- <br />ern Colorado. <br />Figuring everything from the price <br />of seed to diesel fuel, fertilizer and real - <br />estate taxes, Kaan determined it costs, <br />on average, $445 to produce an acre of <br />corn. At $2.15 per bushel and an aver- <br />age yield of 215.75 bushels per acre, the <br />farmer can sell it for $463.86 per acre. In <br />the end, that acre of corn nets the grower <br />a mere $18.86. <br />For people like Gary Earl who are <br />close to retirement, or for those strug- <br />gling financially, the opportunity to <br />receive a steady $120 to $150 per acre <br />seems like a good opportunity. <br />"It's their chance," says Knox. "We've <br />had people tell us that if we offered <br />100,000 (possible acres to lease) it would <br />all go. We're having to put protections in <br />place so one person doesn't come in and <br />take it all." <br />The potential one -year leases to shut <br />down 16 wells for the 2006 irrigation <br />season would take 1,845 acres out of <br />irrigation, but those lands could still be <br />dryland farmed. Participants had until <br />mid -June to sign up for the program. <br />When the dust has cleared and the <br />land is fallowed, Pritchett predicts there <br />will be fewer farms in the region over- <br />all, but the farms will be larger because <br />they will need more acreage to produce <br />the same amount of crops with dryland <br />farming than they did when they were <br />irrigated. He believes agriculture will be <br />economically viable in the area for at <br />least the next 30 to 50 years, but, "This <br />tural condi- <br />tions would not be used to recharge <br />or supplement continuously flowing <br />surface streams, It is specific to deep <br />roundwater urWerlying the eight "des - <br />nated basin fleas created by the <br />compact is probably the tip of the iceberg <br />as far as the problems that will come as <br />we deplete the Ogallala aquifer," Pritchett <br />said, referring to the large underground <br />water supply the irrigation wells tap into. <br />The Ogallala aquifer stretches under <br />eight states, from South Dakota to Texas. <br />According to the U.S. Geological Survey, <br />30 percent of the groundwater used for <br />irrigation in the United States is pumped <br />from the Ogallala. <br />Vs communities such as Wray, Laird <br />and Beecher Island brace for the fall- <br />out from the compact settlement with <br />Kansas and scramble to come into com- <br />pliance, the rift between surface -water <br />users and well owners has deepened. <br />The Pioneer Irrigation District strad- <br />dles the Nebraska state line and serves <br />irrigators in both Colorado and Nebraska. <br />In 2005 the district, as well as all but one <br />of the Laird Ditch owners, filed a lawsuit <br />claiming the unchecked well pumping <br />was depleting the stream and injuring <br />their water rights. <br />Those irrigators own coveted sur- <br />face -water rights dating to the late <br />1800s, in an area where the majority <br />of water users rely on groundwater. <br />They asked the Colorado Ground Water <br />Commission to end the Northern High <br />Plains Designated Ground Water Basin's <br />designation, which would make all wells <br />in the area subject to prior appropriation <br />laws. Under state law, groundwater dis- <br />putes in the designated basins are heard <br />by the Ground Water Commission, not <br />the water courts. <br />The plaintiffs were also asking the state <br />engineer to curtail well usage and require <br />augmentation plans for the 4,100 wells in <br />the basin, claiming that new information <br />provided by the groundwater model in <br />the Kansas vs. Nebraska and Colorado <br />case proved that wells in the basin were <br />tributary to streams. <br />But in a landscape where rivers are <br />often ankle -deep to non - existent, buy- <br />ing surface water rights for augmenta- <br />tion plans could be like finding snow in <br />the Caribbean. Anne Castle, an attorney <br />representing Five Rivers Cattle Feeding <br />LLC, which has 125,000 cattle, says that <br />her client would have to shut down if the <br />wells were declared tributary. <br />"There's no augmentation water to <br />acquire," she says. <br />The suit could have wide- reach- <br />ing implications, overturning 40 years <br />of water administration in the basin, if <br />the basin is undesignated. The small- <br />er groundwater management districts <br />would not exist and the Republican River <br />Water Conservation District would dis- <br />solve as well. <br />The plaintiffs also asked that <br />two members of the Ground Water <br />Commission be disqualified from vot- <br />ing, because they have personal inter- <br />ests at stake in the lawsuit. <br />At a hearing of the matter in front of <br />the Ground Water Commission May 19, <br />attorney Steve Bushong representing the <br />irrigation district and the ditch company, <br />told the commission that fellow members <br />Grant Bledsoe and Dennis Coryell, who <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.