Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMOSA -The fate of proposed state <br />rules governing new groundwater with- <br />drawals from the San Luis Valley's <br />confined aquifer rests in the hands of <br />District Judge O. John Kuenhold. <br />In 1998, the Colorado General <br />Assembly passed House Bill 1011, and <br />Senate Bill 222, passed in 2004, recogniz- <br />ing the valley's unique hydrology and the <br />need to protect existing water rights and <br />the state's Rio Grande Compact deliv- <br />ery obligations to downstream states. In <br />response to those pieces of legislation, <br />Colorado Division of Water Resources <br />State Engineer Hal Simpson promul- <br />gated rules governing new groundwater <br />withdrawals on June 30, 2004. <br />But some don't think the state's rules <br />are fair, and have been protesting them <br />in water court in Alamosa throughout <br />February and March. Challenging the <br />state's rules as unconstitutional are the <br />Colorado Association of Home Builders, <br />San Luis Valley Water Company and <br />Cotton Creek Circles, whose case centers <br />on the "rules governing new withdrawls <br />of ground water in Division 3 affecting <br />the rate or direction of movement of <br />water in the confined aquifer system." <br />Defending the proposed rules are <br />the Attorney General's office repre- <br />senting the state; Rio Grande Water <br />Users Association; Rio Grande Water <br />Conservation District; and the Conejos <br />Water Conservancy District. <br />Judge Kuenhold is presiding over <br />the case which went to trial on January <br />30 and was scheduled to conclude on <br />March 9. The six -week trial included <br />testimony from more than a dozen <br />witnesses testifying on behalf of the <br />state's rules and a half -dozen witnesses <br />opposing them. <br />Proponents of the rules argue the <br />Valley's water situation is unique, with a <br />unique hydrologic structure. They also <br />