Laserfiche WebLink
However, the design of post con- <br />struction structures in mountain con- <br />struction is not continuing the <br />momentum of construction site water <br />quality protection. For example, people <br />in the construction industry know to <br />use more straw bales and rock check <br />dams in steep wwales. As one looks up <br />the drainage Swale, the top of the lower <br />structure must visually line up with the <br />bottom of the uphill structure. Thus <br />the steeper the slope, the more check <br />structures required. Yet a detention <br />pond at the base of the mountain may <br />be the only permanent detention struc- <br />ture. Natural mountain waterways and <br />gulches typically have a stair - stepped <br />surface hydrology. The concept of <br />using cascading structures during con- <br />struction must be carried over to per- <br />manent BMPs throughout the site. <br />Construction BMPs <br />This mountain subdivision will cluster <br />53 homes along 6.5 miles of private road on <br />a 900 -acre property, and allow 85 per cent <br />of the property to remain undeveloped. <br />During construction, typical land develop- <br />ment includes silt fences around disturbed <br />areas and a single sediment pond at the low <br />point of the project site. In fractured granite <br />and steep terrain, silt fence causes damage <br />when installed and is often ineffective. On <br />mountain sites, a dirt berm that is reseeded <br />on the down hill side is more effective and <br />lower cost than installing, maintaining and <br />removing silt fence. Using onsite material <br />where appropriate allows money to be spent <br />in other areas where more robust protection <br />is needed. For example, straw wattles or <br />brush barriers are excellent options for <br />mountain construction. <br />Permanent BMPs <br />Currently, there is still an emphasis on <br />collection and conveyance by both regula- <br />tors and site designers. Applying the prin- <br />ciples of collection and conveyance in the <br />mountains means that runoff water is con- <br />veyed several hundred feet down a moun- <br />tain, picking up erosive power and sedi- <br />ment along the way. <br />Stormwater is then detained at the base <br />of the mountain and discharged into a <br />mountain stream or gulch. The greatest ben- <br />efit to the watershed comes from a series of <br />properly maintained, permanent BMPs that <br />begin close to the source of runoff and <br />restore predevelopment hydrology. For <br />example, roof runoff could be collected and <br />conveyed to infiltration structures. One sys- <br />tem that has been used mimics the function <br />of a septic system— infiltrating water back <br />into the ground. A combination of seepage <br />cisterns and gravel trenches with perforated <br />pipe will provide approximately 2,000 gal- <br />lons of infiltration capacity on each site with <br />an estimated potential recharge of over <br />20,000 gallons per year on each lot and <br />cumulatively over 1 million gallons for the <br />entire subdivision. In larger storms, the grav- <br />el trench may become saturated. However, <br />the trench follows a contour and the surfac- <br />ing water will sheet flow through a natural <br />landscape. <br />Drainage culverts could also be better <br />adapted to mountain use. In older devel- <br />opments, culverts often lack adequate out- <br />let protection and free - falling stormwater <br />creates a plunge pool. A flow diffuser and <br />infiltration structure could be installed to <br />reduce erosion. This structure should also <br />be considered for new construction to pre- <br />vent excessive erosion and water loss from <br />the subdivision. A second option is a seep- <br />age pit ring, where an area around the cis- <br />tern rings is excavated and filled with large <br />rock. This structure keeps a drainage Swale <br />from further eroding into a drainage gulch. <br />A third option is a sump or seepage <br />area. For example, a meadow will receive <br />concentrated flow from a drainage culvert. <br />Outlet protection will be added to the <br />drainage culvert; however the meadow soil <br />beyond the outlet protection will erode, <br />turning a meadow into a channel. The dis- <br />placed dirt and rock will further scour the <br />channel and accelerate the sedimentation <br />in the detention pond at the base of this <br />mountain. To reduce the erosion potential, <br />rock that measures approximately three <br />feet in diameter, will be placed in a semi <br />circle in the meadow in a 30 -50 foot radius <br />from the culvert discharge. This area will <br />be planted with willow shrubs and aspen, <br />which will provide soil stabilization. <br />Colorado Water Law <br />Mimicking predevelopment hydrology <br />through runoff reduction and infiltration <br />structures complies with Colorado Water <br />Law, which states the property (owner) is <br />entitled to the "first use" as gravity delivers <br />water to the ground and rain and <br />snowmelt returns to a surface or ground- <br />water system. Conveyance by gravity flow <br />to a detention pond or to an infiltration <br />structure is legal because it returns the <br />water to the system. Containment systems <br />and structures such as irrigation ponds <br />and rain barrels that capture water and <br />require pumping or otherwise defy gravity <br />constitute a "second use ". This "second <br />use" is not legal without a water right. <br />Conclusion <br />Land development in the fractured and <br />decomposed granite areas of the Rocky <br />Mountains could include a series of influation <br />10 CASFM <br />