Laserfiche WebLink
In the News <br />Arsenic Compliance Difficulties Prompt EPA To Mull <br />' , <br />Variances, Exemptions <br />ucaeton' rid the Environment <br />Responding to the financial hardship laced on small scale water deliver systems <br />p g p p y y <br />Initiative or <br />Brian Brown, California Project <br />by the new federal drinking water standard for arsenic, the U.S. Environmental <br />WET Coordinator <br />Protection Agency (EPA) is considering whether to grant a variance or exemption <br />San Francisco, CA <br />to the rule that would allow higher levels in some communities. <br />The action, announced in a March 2 Federal Register notice, comes on the heels <br />of the Jan. 23, 2006 adoption of a 10 parts per billion (ppb) drinking water standard <br />°oordinator's <br />for arsenic. That figure replaced the previous standard of 50 ppb, which had been in <br />Conference <br />place since 1942 but was determined to be insufficiently protective of human <br />Brian Brown, California Project <br />health. One ppb is equivalent to one drop in an Olympic -size swimming pool. <br />ator <br />Y <br />EPA's proposal would allow water systems serving 10,000 or fewer residents to <br />".William, <br />have arsenic at 30 ppb. Naturally- occurring arsenic is prevalent in many parts of <br />the West, includin Arizona New Mexico and California's Central Valle . g y <br />f Monterey Bay <br />According to scientific research, trace amounts of arsenic in drinking water <br />Governments <br />can cause an increased risk of skin, bladder, lung, kidney and liver cancer. Many of <br />3`d Annual Regional Water Forum <br />the studies that are the basis of current knowledge were done in Taiwan where <br />Rita Schmidt Sudman, speaker <br />some people had consumed well water with arsenic levels in excess of 300 ppb. <br />Monterey, CA <br />The possible cancer - causing effects of arsenic at levels of 5 to 50 ppb in drinking <br />water are the focus of current concerns about public health in the United States. <br />Folsom Dam 50 h Anniversary <br />In its announcement, EPA cited the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments <br />Celebration <br />of 1996, which stipulated that complying with federal drinking water standards is <br />Water Education Foundation, <br />not to cost water systems more than 2.5 percent of the median U.S. household <br />Cooperating Agency <br />income. "The fundamental problem is one of economics," the notice says. "Maxi- <br />Beals Point State Park <br />mum contaminant levels in national primary drinking water regulations have <br />Folsom CA <br />been based on the best available treatment techniques that are affordable for large <br />systems. Because small systems do not enjoy the economies of scale that are <br />available to large systems (infrastructure costs cannot be spread over a large <br />Water Education Foundation <br />number of households) drinking water regulations can have a much greater <br />Reporters' Tour <br />Judy Maben, coordinator <br />economic impact on small systems." <br />Sacramento, CA <br />Environmentalists are concerned that allowing more than 10 ppb arsenic in <br />drinking water could have serious public health implications while the Associa- <br />tion of State Drinking Water Administrators fear the higher standard would <br />"Building a Delta Vision" <br />become the rule, not the exception if larger water agencies seek relief. <br />Conference <br />Krista Clark, regulatory affairs specialist with the Association of California <br />Water Education Foundation, <br />Water Agencies, said EPA has always had the ability to grant variances or exemp- <br />sponsor <br />tions to certain parts of the regulated community. In this case, she said it became <br />Stockton, CA <br />apparent the costs of meeting a 10 ppb arsenic standard would be beyond the <br />financial ability of small water delivery systems. <br />.- <br />f oundation Bay- <br />"I think EPA came to the realization that some of the smaller systems can't <br />Delta Tour <br />afford it and that they are going to bankrupt them," she said. <br />Judy Maben, coordinator <br />Arsenic's natural occurrence in many parts of California is problematic for <br />Sacramento, CA <br />many rural water districts. Of the 487 wells with detections at least 10 ppb, 154 of <br />them serve populations of 200 or fewer people, Clark said. Some water districts, <br />June <br />including the Coachella Valley Water District, are "ahead of the pack" in coming <br />eachers <br />to grips with arsenic treatment. Steve Bigley, water quality specialist with <br />Brian Brown, Education Specialist <br />Coachella, said two of the five smaller systems served by the district are grappling <br />Meadow Valley, CA <br />with the compliance issue. <br />"It's interesting because we are kind of like the country," he said. "The small <br />cation Foundation Water <br />guys are the ones getting hurt in our area." Coachella has pledged more than $12 <br />Law olicy Briefing <br />for its compliance strategy, which includes two treatment plants using state of the <br />Rita Schmidt Sudman, coordinator <br />art technology. — Gary Pitzer -v Anaheim, CA <br />MAY /JUNE 2006 <br />