Laserfiche WebLink
Letters to the Editor <br />I was 11 years old at the time of the December 1955 flood and have some very vivid memories <br />of those days. I remember being at home one evening in after many days of rain. My father, <br />Jack Chrisman, a Visalia city councilman at the time, was downtown at city hall sand bagging <br />the buildings in anticipation of extensive flooding. My brother and I were watching TV and <br />our dog started to bark. <br />I went to the front door and found water coming under the front door. I looked out the <br />window of my father's den and saw water everywhere. Thus began many days of dealing with <br />2 feet of water in our house, spending Christmas at my Uncle and Aunt's home, and riding my <br />bicycle all over town in 2 to 3 feet of water. <br />My father used to say that it was this experience that generated his interest in water <br />resources leading to the creation of the Terminus /Success Flood Control Dams Association, of <br />which he was president, and the construction of flood control dams on the Kaweah and Tule <br />rivers, followed by his appointment to the California Water Commission by then Gov. Pat <br />Brown in 1959. <br />Mike Chrsman <br />California Resources Secretary <br />I read with interest your article in the November /December 2005 Western Water. <br />I also find it interesting that there is a growing view that equates California's flood risk, with <br />Sacramento's flood risk, or even the Delta. It is an interesting phenomenon that is perhaps just <br />a geographical reference since Sacramento is the state capital. <br />A fair reading of the article does address the issue of water supply and levee issues in the <br />Delta, which is true because the SWP and CVP have critical facilities in the Delta that affect a <br />large part of California. However, a fair reading of the article also addresses flooding and levees <br />as a flood control facility. And as such, California's flooding problem is apparently <br />Sacramento's problem. <br />While I will acknowledge that the [Delta] levees are important, it is unfortunate that the <br />Foundation missed the fact that there are a number of levee systems in the state that are <br />important. Santa Cruz and Monterey have the Pajaro River levees that were the source of a <br />lawsuit in the '90s, San Luis Obispo County has issues as well, leading to relinquishment to <br />the state, and there are levee systems in most every other county. Our levee in Santa Barbara <br />County protects a significant portion of the city of Santa Maria as well as thousands of acres of <br />prime farmland. The levee was a federal project built by the Corps. That levee is in California, <br />too. <br />My hope is that the Foundation could perhaps have broader views as well. As one of you <br />worthy missions; informing California about California flooding issues, I would hope in the <br />future that the rest of state be included in your discussions (what an educational opportunity). <br />Sacramento is in California, for sure, but this is a big state. <br />Tom Fayram <br />Deputy County Public Works Director <br />Santa Barbara County <br />Editor's note: We realize the issue of flood control is of statewide importance and highly relevant to <br />specific regions, such as the ones you mentioned. We by no means claim that the issues of Sacramento <br />and the Delta are exclusively important and take precedent to other areas. However, we felt it was <br />important to stress the importance of Delta levees given their role in protecting the water supply for <br />more than 20 million people. While editorial limits forced us to narrow the focus of article, we <br />recognize the enormous resources invested in flood management throughout the entire West. And <br />we plan to present a wider encompassing view of flood management in the future. <br />Great story. Yes, I believe you are correct in saying "we seem to lack the will." But I think <br />we have forgotten history also. The great flood of 1862 created a lake from Red Bluff to <br />Bakersfield. That is just a little over 100 years ago. And the Sutter Basin almost got it in the <br />1955 flood. I remember driving through that area a week after the levee break seeing the dead <br />animals and the houses in Yuba City piled on top of each other. Think of all the development <br />in the Natomas area now. <br />I think Sacramento poses a much greater life and material damage threat than the Gulf <br />events as a result of a levee failure. And I sure don't think that the 100- and 200 -year protec- <br />tion is anywhere near adequate. As to the Delta levees, Gary says failures are "likely" and I say <br />they are inevitable. Keep up the good work. <br />Joseph E. Patten <br />JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2006 <br />February e <br />ArVff&ffi—aA7orId Water <br />Forum <br />Rita Schmidt Sudman, speaker <br />Los Angeles, CA <br />Water Education Foundation <br />Open House <br />"A Valentine for our Supporters" <br />Sacramento CA <br />f <br />LtF,,ebruary 251 oneerence <br />Sue McClurg, speaker <br />Brian Brown, Project WET <br />Workshop <br />Fresno, CA <br />on Foundation U.S. - <br />Mexican Border Water Issues Tour <br />Judy Maben, tour coordinator <br />Yuma, AZ <br />ation of Bilingual <br />Educators Conference <br />Water Education Foundation exhibit <br />San Jose, CA <br />a i ornia Public Utilities <br />Commission <br />Administrative Law Judges <br />Rita Schmidt Sudman, speaker <br />San Francisco, CA <br />Water Education Foundation Board <br />of Directors Meeting <br />Mike Armstrong, president <br />Sacramento, CA <br />March 2 K <br />ati undation <br />Executive Briefing <br />Rita Schmidt Sudman, coordinator <br />Sacramento, CA <br />