My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
River Report Winter 2005-2006
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
River Report Winter 2005-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 11:09:03 AM
Creation date
2/20/2013 4:03:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2006
Title
River Report
Author
Colorado River Project
Description
A Project of the Water Education Foundation; Winter 2005-2006
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
`Global Solution' to Colorado <br />Water Dispute Under Study <br />A new study is under way to evaluate a <br />possible "global solution" to ongoing <br />water disputes between Colorado's rural <br />Western Slope and the more urban <br />Front Range around Denver. The study <br />will examine the feasibility of building <br />an off - stream reservoir near Wolcott, <br />Colo., that could supply water to <br />irrigators who now receive their water <br />from Green Mountain Reservoir. The <br />project also would provide water for <br />environmental uses of the Eagle River, a <br />tributary of the Colorado River, and free <br />up water in Green Mountain Reservoir <br />for use by Front Range cities. <br />Details of the proposal are still <br />sketchy, but parties hope a plan will <br />emerge that harmonizes the interests of <br />Western Slope irrigators with the Front <br />Range's growing water needs while also <br />enhancing habitat for endangered fish. <br />Earlier technical studies concluded that <br />a Wolcott Reservoir could hold between <br />160,000 and 350,000 acre -feet of water, <br />and a 2004 feasibility study looked at <br />three smaller storage scenarios. <br />Front Range and Western Slope <br />agencies will share the $200,000 cost of <br />Study Finds Salt Cedar <br />Management Options Limited <br />Opportunities for managing salt cedar as <br />a way of augmenting water supplies may <br />be limited, according to a white paper <br />produced by the Arizona Department of <br />Water Resources (ADWR). The study <br />cites the presence of endangered species, <br />complex land ownership and variability <br />in evapotranspiration (ET) rates as <br />factors that should be considered before <br />undertaking a salt cedar removal or <br />eradication project. <br />Salt cedar has become established in <br />several reaches of the Colorado River, <br />mainly south of Davis Dam. Where it is <br />established, salt cedar's deep root systems <br />the new study, which will evaluate cost, <br />water quality and hydrology. In addition <br />to looking at the feasibility of a Wolcott <br />Reservoir, the study will evaluate re- <br />operation of Green Mountain Reservoir, <br />about 60 miles west of Denver, to allow <br />Grand Valley irrigators, who currently <br />receive about 52,000 acre -feet of water <br />from Green Mountain, to draw their <br />water from Wolcott. The switch would <br />allow water to be diverted from Green <br />Mountain to the Front Range via the <br />existing Roberts Tunnel. Water from the <br />proposed Wolcott Reservoir also would <br />be used to enhance fish habitat in the <br />Eagle River. <br />Results Unclear from Glen <br />Canyon Flow Experiments <br />Despite a decade of experiments, <br />scientists are still unsure what effects <br />different flow regimes from Glen <br />Canyon Dam have on areas below the <br />dam. Several different flow combina- <br />tions have been tried, including simu- <br />lated floods, in efforts to understand <br />how conditions can be improved for <br />native species and recreation to more <br />closely resemble the river's natural <br />flow variations. <br />are believed to deplete groundwater <br />supplies and increase soil salinity, <br />making areas crowded with salt cedar <br />inhospitable to less salt- tolerant native <br />plants. Projects to eliminate salt cedar by <br />physical removal have proved costly, and <br />water quality concerns limit eradication <br />projects using chemicals. <br />The ADWR paper notes that studies <br />of salt cedar removal projects have <br />yielded mixed results. A recent study <br />cited in the paper concluded that <br />increases in water yield following salt <br />cedar removal were likely to occur only <br />when a salt cedar stand containing high <br />leaf area was replaced by vegetation with <br />a low leaf area. Other studies indicate <br />In early October, Reclamation <br />continued with a series of short -term flow <br />experiments in an effort to understand <br />the relationship between dam operations <br />and dissolved oxygen concentrations in <br />the river. Low dissolved oxygen levels are <br />harmful to fish. A combination of large <br />amounts of sediment and organic matter <br />from a five -year drought followed by <br />above - average runoff during the spring <br />and summer of 2005 has depleted <br />dissolved oxygen levels below the dam. <br />Researchers are trying to determine if low <br />releases spread among varying numbers of <br />generating units will inject more oxygen <br />into the water. <br />During August and September, Recla- <br />mation tried a series of alternating steady <br />and low fluctuating experimental releases <br />to evaluate their effects on sediment <br />movement and native fish. The experi- <br />ments were recommended by the Glen <br />Canyon Adaptive Management Work Group. <br />Living Rivers, a group that advocates <br />decommissioning Glen Canyon Dam, <br />issued a report in late October conclud- <br />ing that the adaptive management <br />program has done more studying than <br />acting to recover endangered species and <br />rebuild habitat in Grand Canyon. - <br />wide variability in ET measurements <br />for salt cedar, suggesting that water <br />yield improvements also could vary <br />after removal projects. <br />Opportunities for removal projects <br />also are complicated by differing land <br />ownership and management along key <br />reaches of the river, the ADWR study <br />found. Federal and state agencies, Indian <br />tribes and private land owners control <br />access to land where removal projects <br />might occur. In addition, native species, <br />such as the Southwest willow flycatcher <br />(listed as endangered under the federal <br />Endangered Species Act), nest in salt <br />cedar along the west side ofTopock <br />Marsh. - <br />WINTER 2005 -2006 • RIVER REPORT • COLORADO RIVER PROJECT • 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.