Laserfiche WebLink
FROM THE NORTH DAKOTA STATE WATER COMMISSION <br />Corps holds Missouri River meetings <br />By Patrick Fridgen <br />On April 12, the U.S. Army Corps <br />of Engineers stopped in Bismarck <br />as part of its spring public meetings <br />regarding the 2005 Missouri River <br />System Annual Operating Plan. In <br />addition to Bismarck, the Corps <br />also made visits to Glasgow, Mont.; <br />Pierre, SD; Omaha, Neb.; and St. <br />Louis and Kansas City, Mo. At these <br />annual meetings, the Corps provides <br />an overview of the status of the sys- <br />tem as well its plans for dam opera- <br />tion throughout the year — depending <br />on various runoff scenarios. <br />To begin the hearing, the Corps <br />emphasized the severity of the current <br />drought in the Missouri River basin, <br />which is now in its fifth year - with <br />little relief in sight (see Drought <br />Monitor figure). As of April 1, the <br />mountain snowpack water content <br />0 <br />C10 Abnormally Dry <br />D Drought - Moderate <br />M 02 Drought • Severe <br />0 D3 Drought - Extreme <br />0 D4 Draught • Exceptional <br />above Fort Peck was only at 71 <br />percent of normal, and between <br />Fort Peck and Garrison, it was only <br />slightly higher at 73 percent of <br />normal. This means a continued drop <br />in system storage can be expected <br />throughout the coming year. <br />As far as system storage goes, <br />there are currently only 35.5 million <br />acre -feet (MAF) of water stored in <br />the system — which is a new spring <br />record low. To put this into perspec- <br />tive, the previous record low was set <br />in January 1991, at 40.8 MAE In a <br />normal year, the Corps typically likes <br />to start the summer with 57 MAF of <br />water in the system, or 21.5 MAF <br />more than is currently available. <br />Of great significance, is the fact <br />that the system has been drawn down <br />so far, that the very industry (naviga- <br />tion) that has advocated higher river <br />Ltgugitt.tttmrA Iypeo <br />N Delineates dominant impacts <br />A = AgrxxUtural (crops, pastures <br />grasslands) <br />H = Hydrological (water) <br />(No We = 001h impacts) <br />The Drought Monitor focuses on broad -scale conditions <br />Locei conatrons trey vary. See accompanying text summary <br />for forecast statements. <br />RO%8ed Thursday, April 7, 2005 <br />AttMor posglas to Comte, CPQNOAA <br />flows downstream and the release of <br />water from upper basin reservoirs, <br />will now be subjected to a shortened <br />navigation season. If system storage <br />dips below 35 MAF by July 1, the <br />navigation season will be shortened <br />61 days. If system storage dips below <br />31 MAF before March 15, 2006, <br />there will be no additional water <br />released for navigation next year. <br />As Gov. Hoeven pointed out in his <br />remarks at the hearing, had the lower <br />basin states been more open to water <br />conservation in the upper reservoirs <br />during the past five years, they might <br />not have been facing a complete <br />shut -down of the navigation industry <br />in the coming years. <br />Unfortunately, it seems that much <br />of the damage has already been done, <br />leaving almost all hope for improve- <br />ment with Mother Nature. As the big <br />upper three reservoirs currently sit, <br />Fort Peck, Garrison, and Oahe are <br />down 35, 29, and 34 -feet, respec- <br />tively. Lake Sakakwea was at 1,808.4 <br />feet above mean sea level (amsl) in <br />April, which was a new record low, <br />surpassing the previous record set in <br />May 1991 of 1,815 feet amsl. If the <br />Corps' projections are correct, Saka- <br />kawea will continue to break record <br />low elevations for most of the next <br />year. On Oahe, the situation is much <br />the same. As of April, its elevation <br />was 1,573.8 feet amsl — far below the <br />previous record low of 1,580.7 feet <br />amsl set in 1989. <br />In response to the record low <br />water levels, there were concerns <br />brought before the Corps by various <br />interests at the hearing relating to <br />weed control and the associated fire <br />danger along the many miles of ex- <br />posed shoreline, water and shoreline <br />access, and the health of the fishery. <br />To address some of these concerns, <br />the Corps has allocated additional <br />funding from its budget to pay for <br />weed control, boat ramp improve- <br />ments /access, water supply intakes, <br />and cultural resources protection. <br />16 North Dakota Water ■ May 2005 <br />