FROM THE NORTH DAKOTA STATE WATER COMMISSION
<br />Corps holds Missouri River meetings
<br />By Patrick Fridgen
<br />On April 12, the U.S. Army Corps
<br />of Engineers stopped in Bismarck
<br />as part of its spring public meetings
<br />regarding the 2005 Missouri River
<br />System Annual Operating Plan. In
<br />addition to Bismarck, the Corps
<br />also made visits to Glasgow, Mont.;
<br />Pierre, SD; Omaha, Neb.; and St.
<br />Louis and Kansas City, Mo. At these
<br />annual meetings, the Corps provides
<br />an overview of the status of the sys-
<br />tem as well its plans for dam opera-
<br />tion throughout the year — depending
<br />on various runoff scenarios.
<br />To begin the hearing, the Corps
<br />emphasized the severity of the current
<br />drought in the Missouri River basin,
<br />which is now in its fifth year - with
<br />little relief in sight (see Drought
<br />Monitor figure). As of April 1, the
<br />mountain snowpack water content
<br />0
<br />C10 Abnormally Dry
<br />D Drought - Moderate
<br />M 02 Drought • Severe
<br />0 D3 Drought - Extreme
<br />0 D4 Draught • Exceptional
<br />above Fort Peck was only at 71
<br />percent of normal, and between
<br />Fort Peck and Garrison, it was only
<br />slightly higher at 73 percent of
<br />normal. This means a continued drop
<br />in system storage can be expected
<br />throughout the coming year.
<br />As far as system storage goes,
<br />there are currently only 35.5 million
<br />acre -feet (MAF) of water stored in
<br />the system — which is a new spring
<br />record low. To put this into perspec-
<br />tive, the previous record low was set
<br />in January 1991, at 40.8 MAE In a
<br />normal year, the Corps typically likes
<br />to start the summer with 57 MAF of
<br />water in the system, or 21.5 MAF
<br />more than is currently available.
<br />Of great significance, is the fact
<br />that the system has been drawn down
<br />so far, that the very industry (naviga-
<br />tion) that has advocated higher river
<br />Ltgugitt.tttmrA Iypeo
<br />N Delineates dominant impacts
<br />A = AgrxxUtural (crops, pastures
<br />grasslands)
<br />H = Hydrological (water)
<br />(No We = 001h impacts)
<br />The Drought Monitor focuses on broad -scale conditions
<br />Locei conatrons trey vary. See accompanying text summary
<br />for forecast statements.
<br />RO%8ed Thursday, April 7, 2005
<br />AttMor posglas to Comte, CPQNOAA
<br />flows downstream and the release of
<br />water from upper basin reservoirs,
<br />will now be subjected to a shortened
<br />navigation season. If system storage
<br />dips below 35 MAF by July 1, the
<br />navigation season will be shortened
<br />61 days. If system storage dips below
<br />31 MAF before March 15, 2006,
<br />there will be no additional water
<br />released for navigation next year.
<br />As Gov. Hoeven pointed out in his
<br />remarks at the hearing, had the lower
<br />basin states been more open to water
<br />conservation in the upper reservoirs
<br />during the past five years, they might
<br />not have been facing a complete
<br />shut -down of the navigation industry
<br />in the coming years.
<br />Unfortunately, it seems that much
<br />of the damage has already been done,
<br />leaving almost all hope for improve-
<br />ment with Mother Nature. As the big
<br />upper three reservoirs currently sit,
<br />Fort Peck, Garrison, and Oahe are
<br />down 35, 29, and 34 -feet, respec-
<br />tively. Lake Sakakwea was at 1,808.4
<br />feet above mean sea level (amsl) in
<br />April, which was a new record low,
<br />surpassing the previous record set in
<br />May 1991 of 1,815 feet amsl. If the
<br />Corps' projections are correct, Saka-
<br />kawea will continue to break record
<br />low elevations for most of the next
<br />year. On Oahe, the situation is much
<br />the same. As of April, its elevation
<br />was 1,573.8 feet amsl — far below the
<br />previous record low of 1,580.7 feet
<br />amsl set in 1989.
<br />In response to the record low
<br />water levels, there were concerns
<br />brought before the Corps by various
<br />interests at the hearing relating to
<br />weed control and the associated fire
<br />danger along the many miles of ex-
<br />posed shoreline, water and shoreline
<br />access, and the health of the fishery.
<br />To address some of these concerns,
<br />the Corps has allocated additional
<br />funding from its budget to pay for
<br />weed control, boat ramp improve-
<br />ments /access, water supply intakes,
<br />and cultural resources protection.
<br />16 North Dakota Water ■ May 2005
<br />
|