My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
The Water Report Nov 2005
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
The Water Report Nov 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 11:13:10 AM
Creation date
2/20/2013 3:31:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
The Water Report
Author
Envirotech Publications
Description
Issue #21
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Issue #21 <br />The Water Report <br />The Draft SEF has been designed with levels to encourage investigations that optimize the amount of <br />Sediments <br />effort expended in the assessment with respect to the complexity of both the project /site and assessment <br />questions that must be answered to reach management decisions. A level in this sense is a stage in the <br />assessment process that concludes with a decision to either: 1) exit the assessment process because <br />Assessment <br />sufficient information has been collected to answer questions about the need for management; or 2) <br />Levels <br />continue the assessment because insufficient information exists to reach a management decision for the <br />proposed action. <br />In many cases management decisions may be possible during the initial phase of an assessment when <br />Management <br />there is convincing evidence for or against the presence of risk or whether or not an appropriate disposal <br />Decisions <br />option exists for dredged materials. In more ambiguous circumstances, or where the complexity of the <br />site requires it, more comprehensive assessments and data collection may be required in a subsequent <br />level before credible management decisions can be made. The strength of a phased assessment <br />framework is that the framework includes clear decision points where the need to continue the evaluation <br />is addressed. <br />This risk -based framework is also structured to allow for iteration. As information is collected and <br />Adaptation <br />analyzed during an evaluation, the assessment process must allow for making additions and refinements <br />to the conceptual model and assessment questions that are formulated during the initial stages of <br />assessment. Such iteration allows the assessment to become more focused as the evaluation proceeds. <br />Figures 2 and 3 present the <br />assessment and management framework <br />Figure 3. Detail of Level I Tasks <br />for sediments. Figure 3 provides <br />additional details for what is included in a <br />Level 1 evaluation. As shown on these <br />Define Project Scope <br />figures, Level 1 includes pre- assessment <br />Establish Project Goals and initial assessment tasks, while Level 2 <br />• Develop Project Conceptual Model <br />. identify contaminants of concern can include sediment - dredged material/ <br />Initial <br />Assessment <br />. Identify resources of concern site assessment, additional chemical and/ <br />. Describe relevant exposure pathways <br />or biological testing, or modeling tasks. <br />Define available management options The levels or sate ories of <br />Develop assessment questions/ g <br />hypotheses information /data needs described below <br />° <br />are used in a sequential manner for <br />,i <br />evaluating the risk of in -place sediments <br />o ; <br />Review Existing Information Is the collected and the suitability of dredged material for <br />es <br />E <br />Physical information sufficient unconfined aquatic disposal. This <br />a <br />chemical for a management sequential approach is called a tiered <br />° <br />Primary <br />i i ? <br />. Biological decson <br />evaluation process. At each level a <br />Assessment N <br />decision is made regarding the adequacy <br />of the existing data to make a suitability <br />determination. If the existing data are <br />Conduct Screening Assessment <br />Collect initial Data adequate for management decision <br />— • Compare to Screening Guidelines making purposes, then there is no need to <br />. Physical proceed to the next level. If not, data at <br />• Chemical the next level are required before a <br />Biological <br />management decision can be made. <br />! <br />x, Transition to Subsequent Levels <br />The compilation and review/ <br />Is the collected , — screening of existing information and <br />i <br />information sufficient \ Y Management other locational factors comprise the <br />for a management i Decision initial tasks in Level 1. In some instances, <br />decision? <br />the existing information may be sufficient <br />to make a management decision. For <br />example, for a navigational dredging <br />N project, if existing information adequately <br />-- supports a decision for unconfined aquatic <br />Level 11 Tasks disposal, no additional data are needed. <br />However, if there is no existing <br />information or it is not adequate for <br />12 Copyright© 2005 Envirotech Publications; Reproduction without permission strictly prohibited. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.