My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GASP FS for Sedgwick
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
5001-6000
>
GASP FS for Sedgwick
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2013 3:46:58 PM
Creation date
2/20/2013 10:08:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/1/1998
Author
TuttleApplegate, Inc.
Title
Feasibility Study for Sedgwick Reservoir for Groundwater Appropriators of the South Platte River Basin Inc. (GASP)
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GASP Sedgwick Reservoir Feasibility Study <br />I. Introduction <br />The Groundwater Appropriators of the South Platte River Basin (GASP) have sponsored this study to <br />address the feasibility of constructing an off stream augmentation reservoir near the Colorado — <br />Nebraska border. The objective of the study was to identify constraints associated with construction <br />of the reservoir and to analyze the effectiveness of the reservoir in achieving the primary function of <br />re- regulating the flows in the South Platte River at the Nebraska State line. Re- regulation of flows in <br />the South Platte River will benefit GASP members by increasing flows at the state line during the <br />irrigation season. <br />The lower section of the South Platte River is defined as the reach of the river from the west <br />boundary of Washington County to the Colorado- Nebraska State line. This reach of the river is <br />commonly known as Water District 64. The South Platte River Compact requires the State of <br />Colorado to administer water rights with adjudicated priority dates junior to June 14, 1897 in such a <br />way that such diversions do not diminish the flow of the river at the Interstate Station on any day <br />below 120 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the period from April 1- October 15. <br />Although the South Platte River has seen an overall increase in flows due to urbanization, <br />agricultural practices, transmountain diversions, and groundwater development, the flow at the State <br />line still drops below 120 cfs compact threshold. Many times the natural flow in the river will not <br />meet compact entitlements even with a curtailment of diversions in District 64. But the possibility <br />for Colorado surface water users in Water District 64 that are junior to June 14, 1897 to have to cease <br />diversions is still a concern of water users. <br />The South Platte River in Water District 64 is a gaining reach of river. This means that return flows <br />to the river tend to increase progressively as it moves towards Nebraska. Approximately 300,000 <br />acre -feet per year in excess of the compact entitlement flow into Nebraska every year. However, the <br />majority of these excess flows occur in the winter months due to the lag time for return flows from <br />irrigated agriculture to enter the river. The proposed reservoir'-s primary function will be to <br />supplement the flows of the South Platte River at the State line on days when the flow of the river at <br />the State line is below 120 cfs during the period of April 1- October 15 on as many days as possible <br />within the constraints of limited storage. By supplementing flows of the South Platte River at the <br />State line on days when the flow of the river at the State line is below 120 cfs, the potential that <br />GASP members would be forced to cease diversions during critical periods would be reduced. <br />GASP has previously commissioned a feasibility study for reservoir sites on the south side of the <br />river in the same approximate geographic area. This study was completed in March 1997 by The <br />Sear -Brown Group. The results of this study indicated that construction of an off - channel reservoir <br />in the uplands sites chosen for study were not conclusively a good choice for a re- regulation project. <br />This work is an extension of evaluating reservoir sites on the north side of the river to determine if <br />there are better alternates. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.