My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Subcommittee on Water and Power Legislative Hearing H.R. 1462
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
8001-9000
>
Subcommittee on Water and Power Legislative Hearing H.R. 1462
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2017 2:22:59 PM
Creation date
2/19/2013 11:10:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
PRRIP and Pathfinder Modification Authorization Act
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
North Platte
Water Division
1
Date
4/26/2007
Author
Steve Lanich, David Zacher, Camille Calimlim
Title
Legislative Hearing on "H.R. 1462, the Platte River Recovery Implementation Program and Pathfinder Modification Authorization Act"
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Legislation
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Opening Statement <br />The Honorable Cathy McMorris Rodgers <br />Ranking Member <br />Water and Power Subcommittee <br />House Natural Resources Committee <br />Legislative Hearing on H.R. 1462 (Udall -CO), <br />"Platte River Recovery Implementation Program and <br />Pathfinder Modification Authorization Act" <br />April 26, 2007 <br />Today, we will discuss a familiar topic in this Subcommittee: the Endangered <br />Species Act and how it impacts western water and power supplies. As many of you <br />know, my home region of the Pacific Northwest is full of ESA conflicts that create <br />massive uncertainty for our farmers and ranchers, our communities and even the future of <br />our fish populations. Nothing or nobody wins, but the lawyers. <br />As we have witnessed time and again in the West, the ESA has become the source <br />of much litigation rather than actual species recovery. Because the ESA was so broadly <br />drafted, the details have been filled in by the courts and the bureaucrats. I don't think that <br />was anyone's intent in 1973 and that's why the overall ESA needs to be improved. <br />Uncertainty is why we are here today. Communities in the Platte River Valley <br />have experienced many jeopardy opinions, much legal wrangling and a 15 year dam re- <br />licensing nightmare — all of which has left the legacy of an uncertain future for a growing <br />region. Meanwhile, actions to protect four endangered species have been piecemeal. <br />Wyoming's Governor put it best when he said "there are no good choices in this area." <br />To the credit of those involved, different factions came together and we have the <br />product before us today. It is by no means the perfect solution nor is it the worst, but it's <br />a meaningful step based upon decades of negotiation. This bill is an example of people <br />talking and listening in good faith. <br />Not every region has the ability to come together and work in a collaborative <br />fashion like this and the ESA doesn't help. This law fosters conflict and stalemates <br />instead of bringing about resolution and action. That's why I want to change the <br />underlying law — but I commend everyone here today for working together to benefit <br />your region in the face of a flawed law. <br />There are still many unanswered questions about this bill and that's why we're <br />having this hearing. I welcome Members of the Subcommittee and the witnesses for <br />being here and look forward to working with you on this bill. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.