My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
C150347 Feasibility Study
CWCB
>
Loan Projects
>
DayForward
>
3001-4000
>
C150347 Feasibility Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2016 12:02:55 PM
Creation date
2/19/2013 10:14:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Loan Projects
Contract/PO #
C150347
Contractor Name
Greeley, City Of
Contract Type
Loan
Water District
3
County
Larimer
Loan Projects - Doc Type
Feasibility Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table of Contents <br />Summary.......................................................................................... ............................... S1 -S3 <br />PartI — Type of Request ..................................................................... ............................... 1 <br />A. Type of Report .................................................................. ............................... 1 <br />B. Type of Action ................................................................... ............................... 1 <br />Part II — Burned Area Description ....................................................... ............................... 1 <br />A. <br />Fire Name and Number ..................................................... ............................... 1 <br />B. <br />Location ............................................................................ ............................... 1 <br />C. <br />Dates ................................................................................. ............................... 1 <br />D. <br />Costs and Damages Repaired ........................................... ............................... 1 <br />E. <br />Watershed Numbers ......................................................... ............................... 2 <br />F. <br />Total Acres Burned ............................................................ ............................... 2 <br />G. <br />Vegetation types ................................................................ ............................... 3 <br />H. <br />Dominant Soils .................................................................. ............................... 3 <br />I. <br />Geologic Types ................................................................. ............................... 3 <br />J. <br />Stream Channels by Order or Class .................................. ............................... 3 <br />K. <br />Transportation System ...................................................... ............................... 4 <br />Part III —Watershed Condition ............................................................ ............................... 4 <br />A. Burn Severity ..................................................................... ............................... 4 <br />B. Water Repellent Soil .......................................................... ............................... 4 <br />C. Soil Erosion Hazard Rating ............................................... ............................... 4 <br />D. Soil Erosion Potential ........................................................ ............................... 5 <br />E. Sediment Potential ............................................................ ............................... 6 <br />Part IV — Hydrologic Design Factors ................................................... ............................... <br />6 <br />A. <br />Estimated Vegetative Recovery Period ............................. ............................... <br />6 <br />B. <br />Design Chance of Success ............................................... ............................... <br />6 <br />C. <br />Design Storm Information .................................................. ............................... <br />6 <br />D. <br />Reduction in Infiltration ...................................................... ............................... <br />6 <br />E. <br />Adjusted Design Flow ........................................................ ............................... <br />6 <br />Part V — Summary <br />of Analysis ........................................................... ............................... <br />8 <br />A. <br />Critical Values / Resources and Threats ............................ ............................... <br />8 <br />B. <br />Emergency Treatment Objectives ..................................... ............................... <br />16 <br />C. <br />Market Resource Values ................................................... ............................... <br />17 <br />D. <br />Skills Represented on Burned -Area Survey Team ............. ............................... <br />18 <br />E. <br />Treatment Narrative .......................................................... ............................... <br />19 <br />Part VI — Summary of Emergency Stabilization Treatments and Source of Funds ............ 24 <br />List of Figures <br />Land Owner and Acreage Breakdown .............................. ............................... <br />SoilBurn Severity ............................................................... ............................... Figures <br />Soil Burn Severity by Watershed ........................................ ............................... included at <br />Percent Flow Increase by Watershed ................................ ............................... end of report <br />Potential Mulching Zones ................................................... ............................... <br />High Park Fire Emergency Stabilization Plan Table of Contents <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.