My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
The Platte River Project
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
The Platte River Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2014 3:06:42 PM
Creation date
2/14/2013 12:03:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Comments of the Platte River Project on the Platte River Program Draft EIS
State
CO
NE
WY
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/20/2004
Author
Platte River EIS Office (PL -100)
Title
Comments of the Platte River Project on the Platte River Program Draft EIS
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commenf of the Platte River Project on the <br />Platte Ri r Recovery Implementation Program DEIS <br />Consistent with Section E.2.a of the Program Document, as long as Tamarack 1 is <br />constructed and operated as described herein, the target flow shortage reduction <br />credited to Tamarack 1 individually or to the Three initial water projects <br />collectively will not be reduced even if the real time frequency and magnitude of <br />flows in excess to targets at Grand Island causes Tamarack 1 to produce an <br />average annual yield that is less than that projected under historic flow conditions, <br />regardless of the reasons for the change. <br />The DEIS analysis of impacts incorrectly relies on the Sed Veg Model. <br />he DEIS portrayal of environmental consequences incorrectly relies on the Sediment <br />Vegetat on Model. There are significant unknowns regarding the use of this unproven tool. The <br />states o Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming had an independent review of the data and model <br />develop A by the Department of Interior [see Platte River Channel Dynamics Investigation, <br />Parsons May 2003]. The Parsons investigation cast serious doubt regarding the conclusions <br />reached by DOI. Significant issues concerning process relationships (geomorphic, plant <br />physiology, and the linkage of the two) and calibration and verification persist. Yet, this "tool" <br />forms tl e foundation upon which the assumptions and projections of impacts in the DEIS are <br />he National Academy of Science (NAS) review of Endangered and Threatened Species <br />on the latte River (April 2004) also recognized that the Sed Veg Model has not been fully <br />comple d or tested for application and decision making on the Platte River. The Academy had <br />the folldwing remarks: <br />"The study committee did not evaluate three items ... an advanced computer <br />model, SEDVEG, to evaluate the interactions among hydrology, river hydraulics, <br />sediment transport, and vegetation being developed, but not yet completed or <br />tested, by USBR for application on the Platte River ...." (p. 5) <br />"The committee did not assess the newer models, because they have not yet been <br />completed or tested, but it recommends that they explored for their ability to <br />improve decision - making." (p. 9) <br />"The committee also recognizes that there has been no substantial testing of the <br />predictions resulting from DOI's previous modeling work, and it recommends that <br />calibration of the models be improved." (p. 9) <br />"Current DOI model developments, including the emerging SEDVEG model, are <br />likely to be helpful and useful in both understanding and managing the Platte <br />River. DOI's determination of suitable habitat rests on the best available science. <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.