Laserfiche WebLink
Work t date: The Annual WSWC Water Management Symposium has traditionally been held <br />under t auspices of the Executive Committee. However, the Committee has asked one of the <br />other c ittees to take the lead. Thus, over the years 1991 -1993, given the fact that the subject <br />was de ted to the negotiated settlement of Indian water right claims, the lead responsibility for <br />putting he symposium together was delegated to the Legal Committee. In 1993, a decision was <br />made t t a symposium on Indian right settlements should be deferred until September 1995. <br />For 199 , the Council chose an alternative topic for its water management symposium, namely, <br />the End#ngered Species Act and Western Water Management. <br />In 1995 we went back to the subject of negotiated Indian water right settlements in the form of a <br />symposium cosponsored by the Native American Rights Fund. Although the 1995 symposium <br />was suc essful, the pace of settlements is such that a 1996 meeting on the same subject would <br />likely hi Lve been redundant. Therefore, another subject was pursued; namely, state <br />progr s /approaches to address non -point source pollution. <br />Given tfie continued interest by previous attendees and also anticipated activities by the WGA <br />within t e context of the Ad Hoc Group on Indian Water Rights, pursuant to a WGA resolution, <br />to reinv gorate the process for facilitating negotiated settlements, and the fact that the Native <br />Americ Rights Fund had expressed its interest in cosponsoring another symposium, the <br />Council determined to hold another symposium on Indian water rights. It was held in Phoenix, <br />Arizon in October, 1997 and included a session on water quality concerns primarily revolving <br />around ection 518 of the Clean Water Act. <br />Given toe fact that the Ad Hoc Group is planning a congressional workshop in 1998, another <br />topic will be the focus of the fall symposium; namely, the Endangered Species Act. <br />Three years ago, the Council held a symposium on reforms in implementing the Endangered <br />Species Act. This symposium was cosponsored by the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife <br />Agencies, as well as the Western Governors' Association. The symposium was preceded by a <br />report oi i challenges which the Act represented for western water resource management, prepared <br />by WS C staff. These efforts led to further evaluation and activity under the auspices of the <br />WGA, 1hich in turn produced proposed amendments to the law. <br />ESA re thorization continues to be on the Congressional agenda. At the same time, several <br />reforms ave been initiated during the last three years. For example, the "Safe Harbor" initiative <br />allows a Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service, in cooperation <br />with ap ropriate state agencies and tribal governments, to provide property owners with certain <br />assuran es in return for voluntarily entering into an agreement enhancing the recovery of the <br />listed s cies. A "no surprises" policy was formalized with the purpose of ensuring landowners <br />who cor iply in good faith with an endangered species habitat conservation plan that they will not <br />later be equired to provide additional land or financial compensation. At the same time, various <br />P <br />