|
References
<br />Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. Portney, E. Leamer, R. Radner
<br />and H. Schuman. 1993. Report of the NOAA
<br />Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register
<br />58(10):4602 -4614.
<br />Bernhardt, E. and 12 others. 2005. Synthesizing U.S.
<br />River Restoration Efforts. Science Vol 308: 636-
<br />637. April 29, 2005.
<br />Carson, R., M. Hanemann, R. Kopp, J. Krosnick, B.
<br />Mitchell, S. Presseor, P. Ruud, V.K. Smith, M.
<br />Conaway, and K. Martin. Temporal Reliability of
<br />Estimates from Contingent Valuation. Land Eco-
<br />nomics 73(2): 151 -163.
<br />Colby, B. and S. Wishart. 2002. Quantifying the
<br />Influence of Desert Riparian Areas on Residential
<br />Property Values. The Appraisal Journal 70 (3):
<br />304 -308.
<br />Colby, B., R. Bark and D. Osgood. 2005. Valuing
<br />Restoration of Water Dependent Urban Ameni-
<br />ties. Proceedings of the UCWOR/NIWR Annual
<br />Conference. Portland Maine.
<br />Fisher, A. and R. Raucher. 1984. Intrinsic Benefits of
<br />Improved Water Quality: Conceptual and Empiri-
<br />cal Perspectives. In V.K. Smith, ed. Advances in
<br />Applied Micro - Economics. JAI Press Inc, Green-
<br />wich, CT.
<br />Loomis, John. 1989. Test Re -test Reliability of the
<br />Contingent Valuation Method: A Comparison of
<br />General Population and Visitor Responses. Ameri-
<br />can Journal of Agricultural Economics, Volume
<br />71(l):76-84.
<br />Loomis, J. 1996. Measuring the Economic Benefits of
<br />Removing Dams and Restoring the Elwha River:
<br />Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey. Water
<br />Resources Research 32(2): 441 -447.
<br />Loomis, John. 2000. Vertically Summing Public Good
<br />Demand Curves. Land Economics 76(2): 312 -321.
<br />Loomis, J. and R. Walsh. 1997. Recreation Economic
<br />Decisions, 2nd Edition. Venture Publishing, State
<br />College, PA.
<br />Netusil, N.R. 2005. Does Ownership Matter? Exam-
<br />ining the Relationship Between Property Values
<br />and Privately and Publicly Owned Open Spaces,
<br />Streams and Wetlands. Reed College, Department
<br />of Economics, Working Paper.
<br />Portney, P. 1994. The Contingent Valuation Debate:
<br />Why Economists Should Care. Journal of Eco-
<br />nomic Perspectives 8(4): 3 -18.
<br />Reiling, S., K. Boyle, M. Phillips, and M. Anderson.
<br />1990. Temporal Reliability of Contingent Values.
<br />Land Economics 66(2): 128 -134.
<br />Sanders, L., R. Walsh, and J. Loomis. 1990. Toward
<br />Empirical Estimation of the Total Value of Pro-
<br />tecting Rivers. Water Resources Research 26(7):
<br />1345 -1358.
<br />Streiner, C.F. and J. Loomis. 1995. Estimating the
<br />Benefits of Urban Stream Restoration Using
<br />the Hedonic Price Method. Rivers 5 (4): 267 -78.
<br />United States District Court of Appeals for the District
<br />of Columbia Circuit. 1989. State of Ohio vs US.
<br />Department of Interior, et al. Cases # 86 -1529 and
<br /># 86 -1575. July 14, 1989.
<br />U.S. Department of Interior (USDOI). 1994. Natural
<br />Resource Damage Assessments; Final Rule. 43
<br />CFR Part 11. Federal Register 59(58): 14262-
<br />14288.
<br />Ward, Kevin and John Duffield. 1992. Natural Re-
<br />source Damages: Law and Economics. John Wiley
<br />and Sons. New York, NY.
<br />Mark your calendar now:
<br />Produced Waters Workshop
<br />Energy and Water - How Can We Get Both for the Price of One?
<br />April 4 -5, 2006
<br />Fort Collins, Colorado
<br />For more information go to: www.cwrri.colostate.edu
<br />1
<br />
|