My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Natural Hazard Observer Nov 2005
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Natural Hazard Observer Nov 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 12:33:38 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 4:15:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Natural Hazards Observer
Author
Natural Hazards Center University of Colorado at Boulder
Description
November 2005
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9 <br />u <br />volunteers to help vulnerable Americans make their <br />homes and communities safer and better prepared for <br />emergencies of all kinds. By training Meals on Wheels <br />volunteers in emergency preparedness, the often under - <br />served vulnerable populations will have greater access to <br />critical preparedness information, guidance, and assur- <br />ance. For more information about Citizen Corps, visit <br />http://Www.citizencorps.gov/. To learn more about the <br />Meal on Wheels Association of America, visit http: // <br />www.mowaa.org/. <br />NOD Releases Findings <br />of Katrina Rapid <br />Assessment Teams <br />----`-151 <br />U-,;t8 <br />On October 5, the National Organization on <br />Disability (NOD) released the findings of its Hurri- <br />cane Katrina rapid assessment teams and announced <br />the formation of an independent task force to address <br />the system -wide challenges brought to light after <br />Katrina. Four assessment teams were deployed in re- <br />sponse to the devastation and loss of life caused by <br />Hurricane Katrina to investigate the status of re- <br />sponse and recovery for the special needs popula- <br />tions, which included people with disabilities, the <br />elderly, and medically managed individuals. Their <br />goal was to identify and review systemic points of <br />weakness and opportunities for immediate actionable <br />corrections to alleviate suffering during emergency <br />response operations. <br />The teams gathered data on gaps in response ef- <br />forts and on long -term recovery needs. They also <br />collected information to support or disprove "sto- <br />ries" that emerged from the disability and senior <br />communities. Their findings and recommendations <br />for action are available in the full 16 -page report, <br />which can be accessed at http://Www.nod.org/Re <br />sources /PDFs /katrina snake_report.pdf. Additional <br />information about NOD and its Emergency Prepar- <br />edness Initiative can be found at http: / /www. nod <br />. org /emergency/. <br />Report on the Status of 9/11 <br />Commission Recommendations <br />On September 14, the 9/11 Public Discourse Project, <br />the nonprofit successor organization to the 9/11 Commis- <br />sion, released the first of several reports that will assess <br />the status of the 41 recommendations made by the com- <br />mission in July 2004 to make the United States safer and <br />more secure. In Report on the Status of 9111 Commission <br />Recommendations —Part 1. Homeland Security, Emer- <br />gency Preparedness and Response the project participants <br />examine recommendations made in the areas of emer- <br />gency preparedness and response, transportation security, <br />and border security. Of the 14 recommendations covered, <br />4 were deemed unsatisfactory, 7 had made minimal pro- <br />gress, and 3 (all in border security) had made some pro- <br />gress. Find out more about the project and download a <br />copy of the report at http://Www.9-llpdp.org/. <br />FEMA after Andrew: <br />Revisiting the Past <br />After Hurricane Andrew tore through southern Flor- <br />ida in 1992, Congress asked the National Academy of <br />Public Administration to conduct several studies of the <br />federal government's capacity to respond effectively to <br />major natural disasters. <br />The first report, released in 1993, examined the ca- <br />pabilities and performance of the Federal Emergency <br />Management Agency (FEMA) during and after Hurricane <br />Andrew. The report, Coping with Catastrophe: Building <br />an Emergency Management System to Meet People's <br />Needs in Natural and Manmade Disaster (165 pp.), fo- <br />cused on: <br />• Executive branch coordination and contingency plan- <br />ning, including leadership by the president; <br />• State and local government capability and coordination <br />with the federal government; <br />• FEMA's role, mission, planning, resources, and leader- <br />ship capabilities; <br />• The effectiveness of governmental responses to major <br />disasters prior to the establishment of FEMA; <br />• Lessons applicable to future disasters; <br />• Congressional oversight practices involving disaster <br />assistance; and <br />• Governmental coordination with private relief agencies, <br />businesses, and citizen initiatives. <br />A 1994 follow -up report came at the request of then <br />FEMA director James Lee Witt. Review of Actions Taken <br />to Strengthen the Nation's Emergency Management Sys- <br />tem (76 pp.) assessed the progress made in implementing <br />recommendations to strengthen FEMA and the nation's <br />emergency management system during his first six months <br />in office. The academy acted in an advisory capacity for <br />this follow -up report. <br />Both reports provide interesting reading and a sense <br />of d6ja vu and are available for free on the academy's <br />Web site at http: / /www.napawasli.org /. <br />19 Natural Hazards Observer November 2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.