My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Artifical Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Artifical Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 12:43:49 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 2:55:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2004
Title
Artificial Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado
Author
Colorado Geological Survey Department of Natural Resources
Description
A Statewide Assessment 2004
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Artificial Recharge of Ground Water in Colorado <br />A Statewide Assessment <br />Figure III -6. Denver Basin hydrographs and ASR operation. <br />Fig. III -6a A typical hydrograph from an Arapahoe Aquifer well in the Highlands Ranch area illustrate a <br />regional water level decline of approximately 30 feet per year; over a 16 -year period. <br />Fig. III -6b A seasonal cycle overprints the regional trend, where water levels fall through the summer as the aquifer <br />is stressed by pumping from nearby wells, and rise in the winter when nearby pumping decreases. <br />Fig. III -6c is from an active ASR well operated by the Centennial Water and Sanitation District that shows cycles <br />of water injection (blue points), extraction (red points), and recovery (white points). A projection of the <br />recovery cycles (white) suggests that, locally, the rate of water level decline is less than the regional rate, <br />nossiblu due to the aquifer restoration benefit of artificial recharge. <br />13 <br />400- <br />500 - <br />600 -' <br />4f <br />V 700 - <br />¢t <br />°J ' <br />800 <br />�. <br />o <br />900 <br />-C <br />Q1000 j <br />I <br />1100 <br />Time frame in figs. b & c <br />1200 <br />1300 - - - - -- - <br />r- - -� -- - - - <br />Jan. 1985 Jan. 1990 <br />- -- 1 - -- — - - - -- <br />Jan. 1995 Jan.2000 Jan.2005 <br />700- - -- -- - - — - -- <br />800 <br />900 <br />i <br />v 1000 <br />~� <br />1100 <br />o <br />C 1200 <br />Q <br />1300 <br />— Overall <br />1400 <br />trend line <br />1500-1- -F- <br />Jan. 1996 Jan. 1997 <br />Jan. 1998 <br />400 - - -- - - - - <br />— <br />500 -I <br />600 <br />700 <br />800 <br />� <br />�y <br />� I <br />O 900 <br />a 1000 <br />v <br />1100 - <br />♦ Period of injection <br />1200 Period of recovery <br />• Period of extraction <br />1300 -� - -- -- -- - - - -- <br />Jan. 1996 Jan. 1997 <br />Jan. 1998 <br />Figure III -6. Denver Basin hydrographs and ASR operation. <br />Fig. III -6a A typical hydrograph from an Arapahoe Aquifer well in the Highlands Ranch area illustrate a <br />regional water level decline of approximately 30 feet per year; over a 16 -year period. <br />Fig. III -6b A seasonal cycle overprints the regional trend, where water levels fall through the summer as the aquifer <br />is stressed by pumping from nearby wells, and rise in the winter when nearby pumping decreases. <br />Fig. III -6c is from an active ASR well operated by the Centennial Water and Sanitation District that shows cycles <br />of water injection (blue points), extraction (red points), and recovery (white points). A projection of the <br />recovery cycles (white) suggests that, locally, the rate of water level decline is less than the regional rate, <br />nossiblu due to the aquifer restoration benefit of artificial recharge. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.