|
ally- funded water storage and develop-
<br />ment project in Colorado, the Dolores
<br />Project is also one of the most efficient.
<br />All irrigation water provided to its full -
<br />service area is metered through pressur-
<br />ized pipelines and applied by sprinklers.
<br />Individual meters allow irrigators to pay
<br />only for what they use —a strong incen-
<br />tive for conservation that breaks the effi-
<br />ciency- defeating attitude, "I paid for it
<br />and I'm going to use it."
<br />Without the evaporation and seepage
<br />losses associated with open canals, "Our
<br />delivery system is as much as 96 percent
<br />efficient," notes Philip Saletta, Dolores
<br />Conservancy District general manager.
<br />And although it costs considerably more
<br />to deliver water by pressurized pipeline
<br />than ditch, Saletta says that when coupled
<br />with high- efficiency sprinkler irrigation
<br />systems, farmers can still come out ahead
<br />financially and save water.
<br />Still, charged with management of a
<br />project that serves sometimes divergent
<br />water needs, the district cannot afford
<br />to rest on its laurels. According to Don
<br />Schwindt, president of the conservancy's
<br />board of directors, one of the district's
<br />main challenges in coming years will be
<br />to balance desires to expand irrigated
<br />acreage, with desires to allocate more
<br />water for fish and wildlife habitat in the
<br />lower Dolores River. Long -terms plans
<br />have taken shape in what they call the
<br />"Water for Everyone Tomorrow Package"
<br />or WETPACK.
<br />John Porter, former manager of the dis-
<br />trict for 22 years and still a consultant, said
<br />he coined the catchy acronym partly in jest.
<br />"You never get enough water for everyone,"
<br />Porter acknowledges with a laugh.
<br />Unlike many other areas of the state
<br />and nation, where farmers are selling
<br />their water to the highest bidder, Porter
<br />says Montezuma irrigators are actually
<br />looking for more water to expand their
<br />operations. To support this economic
<br />development, this fall, the first phase of
<br />WETPACK will begin installation of the
<br />pipes and pumps necessary to deliver
<br />water to approximately 3,000 previously
<br />unirrigated acres. To accomplish this,
<br />6,000 acre -feet of water was recently
<br />purchased from the Montezuma Valley
<br />Irrigation Company. It was a popular
<br />move. Owners of more than 13,000
<br />acres, Porter notes, expressed interest in
<br />the first phase of WETPACK. "That is a
<br />phenomenal testament to the success of
<br />the Dolores Project and the benefit that
<br />transbasin diversion of water means to
<br />the economy of the area," he says.
<br />"That's one of the stories of the Dolores
<br />Project that's so important," agrees Schwindt,
<br />a Stanford - educated farmer who grows
<br />alfalfa near his native Cortez. According
<br />to Schwindt, this project has kept water
<br />in agriculture, opened up new lands for
<br />cultivation, and substantially boosted the
<br />economy of this remote rural area.
<br />But what about the fish? After the first
<br />transbasin diversion from the Dolores
<br />River more than 100 years ago, few fish
<br />survived in what little water the river
<br />had left, especially in late summer. "From
<br />the time of the first diversion in 1886,
<br />the Dolores was a dry, dead river below
<br />that diversion during irrigation season,"
<br />acknowledges Porter.
<br />Yet when cold water was first released
<br />from McPhee Dam in the mid- 1980s, the
<br />Dolores quickly began to develop a reputa-
<br />tion as one of the West's finest tailwater fish-
<br />eries, featuring good -sized brown, rainbow
<br />and cutthroat trout. However, a decade
<br />later, full use of the reservoir and pro-
<br />longed drought dropped river flows drasti-
<br />cally and downstream fisheries declined by
<br />more than 50 percent. In 2002 -2003, the
<br />reservoir was releasing only 14 cubic feet
<br />per second at certain critical times of the
<br />year— barely a trickle.
<br />In an effort to regain the fisheries, ini-
<br />tial re- operation of the reservoir allowed
<br />for lower winter flows in exchange for
<br />larger releases for instream flows in the
<br />summer months. But concern continues
<br />that additional water is needed to guard
<br />against dry years and maintain the health
<br />of the ecosystem.
<br />To help address this concern, in its
<br />second phase WETPACK in looking at the
<br />potential to provide an additional 3,300
<br />acre -feet, increasing the amount of water
<br />available for fish and wildlife from 29,200
<br />to 36,500 acre -feet. To provide the addi-
<br />tional water, a new reservoir call Plateau
<br />Creek has been proposed. As part of this
<br />planning, the district is also participating
<br />in a stakeholder discussion group known
<br />as the Dolores Dialog.
<br />In Colorado today, the Dolores Project
<br />is a high -tech leader in efficient agricultural
<br />water deliveries, also incorporating service
<br />to local municipalities, fisheries, and the
<br />tribes. By making the most efficient and
<br />best use if its water, Schwindt is convinced
<br />that in future years the conservancy district
<br />will continue to be a pioneer in reconciling
<br />competing water uses that contribute to
<br />both the region's economy and quality of
<br />life. And the results may provide a proto-
<br />type for how other water storage projects
<br />must function in the future. "It's the first of
<br />what the West needs to do in the future,"
<br />he insists. ❑
<br />
|