My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Streamlines March 2005
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Streamlines March 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 12:54:10 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 11:53:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Streamlines
Author
Colorado Division of Water Resources
Description
March 2005, Issue 1
Publications - Doc Type
Newsletter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PAGE 4 <br />diversions by the well are simply <br />subject to surface water rights <br />administration like the ditch for <br />which the well has been decreed an <br />alternate point. If there is no <br />verifiable daily accounting, how- <br />ever, the policy of the Division <br />Engineer is that all diversions must <br />be included in the depletion model. <br />In order for the out of priority <br />operation of a well to not result in <br />injury, the plan for augmentation <br />or SWSP must replace all out of <br />priority DEPLETIONS. Deple- <br />tions are what impact the river as a <br />result of diversions at the well. <br />The depletions are "out of priority" <br />if there is a call for water (or <br />compact condition) senior to the <br />well downstream of the well <br />location on the day when those <br />depletions report to the river. <br />Recharge Sites <br />The protocol established by the <br />Division Engineer to guide the <br />development of recharge sites has <br />the following primary components: <br />The Water Commissioner <br />must be notified as to the <br />location and approve the set <br />up of the recharge site <br />before any water may be <br />diverted into the structure. <br />All inlet flows must be <br />metered or measured to the <br />satisfaction of the water <br />commissioner before water <br />will be credited toward <br />recharge. <br />The recharge site must be <br />maintained in such a way as <br />to minimize losses to plants. <br />The recharge credit must be <br />reduced by the net evapora- <br />tion from any pooled water, <br />any surface withdrawals <br />from the site and any phrea- <br />tophytic losses if the site is <br />not maintained free of vegeta- <br />tion. <br />The recharge site may not be <br />used to grow crops in the <br />same irrigation season that it <br />is used as a recharge site. <br />Augmentation Supplies <br />A primary source of augmentation <br />supply, especially in the lower <br />South Platte, is the use of changed <br />reservoir water. The basic require- <br />ment to use the historic consump- <br />tive use associated with reservoir <br />shares as a supply of augmentation <br />water is that the plan must show <br />where the water would have been <br />used as irrigation water and main- <br />tain the associated historic return <br />flows that would have occurred <br />with that use. The exception to this <br />requirement is if water is delivered <br />to recharge ponds located on the <br />farm owning the released shares of <br />reservoir water. <br />Fully consumable water that has <br />been decreed for augmentation has <br />no restrictions on its use. <br />Augmentation wells have been <br />identified as potential short term <br />supplies of augmentation water. <br />Because they create their own <br />depletions that must also eventually <br />be replaced, the plan must include <br />other replacement sources. As with <br />irrigation wells, however, only the <br />out of priority depletions must be <br />replaced. So, depending upon the <br />timing of the use, some depletions <br />may not occur out of priority and, <br />therefore, would not need to be <br />replaced. Any losses that occur <br />during delivery of the water to the <br />river will reduce the augmentation <br />credit. All evaporation and losses <br />STREAMLINES <br />to vegetation must be subtracted <br />from the volume discharged at <br />the well. Infiltration losses, <br />however, may be modeled back <br />to the river like a recharge site. <br />Ditch Bypass Credits <br />The key requirement to using <br />bypassed irrigation water as a <br />source of augmentation supply <br />is to demonstrate how the <br />bypassed flow would have <br />otherwise been beneficially <br />used. Once that demonstration <br />is accepted by the Division <br />Engineer, the plan for augmen- <br />tation must maintain the historic <br />return flows that would have <br />been associated with its benefi- <br />cial use, the same as in the use <br />of changed reservoir water. <br />Any increased depletions <br />created by additional well <br />pumping created by bypassing <br />water at the headgate must also <br />be replaced. <br />Augmentation Plan Responsi- <br />bility <br />The plan for augmentation has <br />several points of responsibility <br />for the non - injurious operation <br />of the plan. First, it must <br />provide a projection of the plan <br />operation by April 1 of each <br />year that shows how the plan <br />will be operated that year; i.e. <br />planned diversions, historic <br />diversion and return flow <br />obligations and available aug- <br />mentation supplies. This <br />projection must then be updated <br />monthly with real data through <br />the end of the irrigation season. <br />The plan for augmentation is <br />responsible for not just report- <br />(Continued on page 5) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.