My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado Water Oct 2005
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Colorado Water Oct 2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2013 12:59:15 PM
Creation date
2/13/2013 11:10:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2005
Title
Colroado Water
Author
Water Center of Colorado State University
Description
October 2005 Issue
Publications - Doc Type
Newsletter
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C04VO <br />—University <br />Agricultural <br />Experiment <br />Station <br />Leaching of Nitrogen and Phosphorus from Irrigated Turf <br />by Jennifer E. Morgan, Graduate Research Assistant <br />Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University <br />utrophication of drinking water reservoirs, <br />accelerated by nutrients, is a significant <br />problem in Colorado, and urban land- <br />scapes, including irrigated turf, are one of many <br />potential sources of nutrient loading to reser- <br />voirs. Previous nutrient transport studies have <br />tended to be site and situation specific and have <br />not often addressed nitrogen and phosphorus <br />transport simultaneously. Conclusions of these <br />studies often disagree, especially with regard to <br />phosphorus transport. Leaching of phosphorus <br />from turf grass is typically considered to be negli- <br />gible due to the tendency of phosphorus to read- <br />ily adsorb to soil particles. However, some recent <br />studies have determined that substantial loads of <br />phosphorus can be transported in leachate. <br />To add some clarity to this issue, particularly <br />with regard to Colorado conditions, the Colorado <br />Agricultural Experiment Station has supported <br />research at CSU to assess the influ- <br />ence of fertilizer treatment on nitro- <br />gen and phosphorus leaching from <br />irrigated turf grass in a Colorado <br />landscape. This article provides a <br />snapshot of the study. <br />Two separate leaching experiments <br />were conducted using 24 sprinkler <br />irrigated lysimeters (Figure 1) lo- <br />cated at the Agricultural Engineer- <br />ing Research Center at Colorado <br />State University. Experiment 1 <br />was designed to evaluate the effect <br />of ammonium sulfate on N and P <br />leaching and involved the applica- <br />tion of ammonium sulfate fertilizer <br />at rates of zero, 25.7 and 77 kg N <br />ha -1. Experiment 2 was designed <br />to evaluate the effect of both super- <br />phosphate and ammonium sulfate <br />fertilizers on N and P leaching and <br />involved three different fertilizer <br />treatments: no fertilizer, super- <br />phosphate fertilizer (55 kg P ha -1) <br />, and a combination of superphosphate (55 kg <br />P ha -1) and ammonium sulfate (77 kg N ha -1) <br />fertilizers. <br />Irrigation was applied three times per week for <br />both experiments, and leachate was collected <br />following each irrigation event. Water drained <br />from each lysimeter was measured for volume, <br />and samples were analyzed for nitrate and <br />phosphate concentrations. Total phosphorus <br />concentrations, measured on occasion through- <br />out the study, were typically equal to the <br />concentrations measured for phosphate. Thus, <br />it was appropriate to assume that phosphate <br />measurements provided a reliable estimate of <br />total phosphorus leaching. <br />Figure 1. One of twenty -four lysim- <br />eters used during the nutrient leach- <br />ing experiments conducted at the <br />Agricultural Engineering Research <br />Center at Colorado State University. <br />age nitrate concentration <br />was observed for all three <br />treatments. The trend <br />was similar for both the <br />fertilized and unfertilized <br />lysimeters, suggesting that <br />the increase in concentra- <br />tion may have been due <br />to higher irrigation rates <br />at that point in time. The <br />effect was more dramatic <br />for several individual <br />lysimeters and may have <br />been the result of preferen- <br />tial flow. As illustrated by <br />the range of nitrate concen- <br />trations for each fertilizer <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.