Laserfiche WebLink
mining camp town of Leadville, then in the throes of <br />the silver boom. After serving as principal of the local <br />school for two years, he decided to attend law school <br />at the University of Michigan, then returning to the <br />Western Slope, where he held a variety of local politi- <br />cal offices before being elected to the U.S. House of <br />Representatives in 1908. He won election to Congress <br />by taking a strong position against the growing federal <br />presence in the management of the West's public lands, <br />Taylor would serve as the Western Slope of Colorado's <br />sole Congressman until his death in 1941.4 <br />Taylor's lengthy career has several themes and les- <br />sons where Western water development is concerned. <br />He is the forerunner of a strategy of protecting what is <br />termed today, basin or basins of origin from the politics <br />of inter -basin water transfers. He was the first major <br />Western Colorado politician to point the way toward a <br />strategy for protecting the Western Slope from the water <br />machinations of the Eastern Slope. Taylor had always <br />suspected the Eastern Slope of wanting to divert the <br />waters of the Western Slope without adequate compen- <br />sation. His worst fears became reality in the movement <br />for the Colorado -Big Thompson Project (C -BT). The <br />Eastern Slope had distinct political advantages —a grow- <br />ing population, political strength and the need to put the <br />water to immediate beneficial use. The Western Slope's <br />advantages were natural —it had the headwaters of some <br />of the intermountain West's major rivers, but had a <br />small population with little apparent political strength. <br />As far back as the 1880s, residents of the South Platte <br />Valley on Colorado's Front Range had shown an inter- <br />est in tapping the headwaters of the Grand River (late <br />renamed the Colorado) for use on the thirsty eastern <br />plains. In the early 1930s, East Slope newspaper edi- <br />tors, politicians, and water users organized into what <br />would become the Northern Colorado Water Conser- <br />vancy District to propose the C -BT. The project would <br />take water from the headwaters of the Colorado River <br />through a maze of tunnels, reservoirs, and ditches to <br />bring about 300,000 acre feet if water annually to the <br />Front Range. While the engineering challenges of the <br />project were nothing short of amazing, its major po- <br />litical obstacles would be presented by Congressman <br />Edward T. Taylor.' <br />Taylor paternalistically regarded every drop of water on <br />the Western Slope as his to protect and control. As the <br />voice of the Western Slope's twenty -two counties, he <br />argued that since 70 percent of all the annual flow of the <br />Colorado River originated high in the mountains of his <br />Congressional District, he could insist that every drop of <br />water taken from the Western Slope should be replaced <br />by the construction of additional storage facilities for <br />that part of the state. This became known as the "acre <br />foot for acre foot" provision, or strategy. More impor- <br />tantly, Taylor was in a position to make good upon his <br />demands. By the late 1930s he was Chairman of the <br />House Appropriations Committee and in a strong posi- <br />tion to block almost any legislation deemed damaging to <br />his Congressional District.6 <br />When the Colorado -Big Thompson Project became law <br />in 1937, Taylor did not quite get his acre -foot for acre <br />foot demand, but he did get his request for compensa- <br />tory storage recognized. Two lessons were learned from <br />Taylor's experience that were instructional for later <br />generations of Colorado and Western water politicians: <br />to insist on compensatory storage in inter -basin transfers <br />and be in a strong political position to be able to effect <br />the outcome of water legislation. Taylor's example <br />would continue to hover over future East and West <br />Slope water negotiations to the present day. <br />The other Western Slope Colorado water leader who <br />influenced both the regional and national water debate <br />was Wayne Norviel Aspinall. Born in Ohio, he moved <br />to Colorado at age eight in 1904 and was raised near the <br />small town of Palisade where his parents bought and <br />operated a peach orchard. From early in life, Wayne <br />Aspinall learned the importance of diverting and apply- <br />ing water to make things grow in the and West. After <br />graduating first from Denver University, he earned a <br />law degree at the same school, owned his own peach <br />orchard, taught school, practiced law, and set his sights <br />on a career in politics. After serving in both houses of <br />the Colorado General Assembly for every year but two <br />between 1930 and 1948, the enterprising Aspinall was <br />elected to the U.S. Congress.' <br />Once in Congress, Aspinall consciously followed in the <br />footsteps of Edward T. Taylor. Specifically, Aspinall <br />learned that to remain in Washington, D.C., he would <br />need to advocate the case for enhancing both the West- <br />ern Slope and the Upper Colorado River Basin's water <br />storage capacity. At a time when most Congressmen <br />aspired to more nationally prestigious seats on commit- <br />tees such as Ways and Means Judiciary, or Appropria- <br />tions, Aspinall made an early decision to gain a seat and <br />remain on the House Interior Committee, the committee <br />that handled almost every important piece of legislation <br />