My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CDOW review and comments of the PRRIP Draft Environmental Impact Statement
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
CDOW review and comments of the PRRIP Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2014 3:20:26 PM
Creation date
2/12/2013 12:32:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
related to the Platte River Endangered Species Partnership (aka Platte River Cooperative Agreement [CA]; aka Platte River Recovery Implementation Program [PRRIP])
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
9/20/2004
Author
Bruce McCloskey, Director DOW
Title
Platte River EIS Office
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 5 -88 South Platte River <br />This paragraph shows general predicted flow changes. Flows are generally increased in March, April, May, <br />August, September, and October and reduced in November, December, and January. <br />In general this flow regime may benefit many fish species and riparian plant communities. There could be impacts <br />to wintering waterfowl and native fish if natural slough flows are reduced by pumping in late winter. These warm <br />water sloughs provide important habitat for many species including small fish in the winter. <br />Pages 5- 174 -177 State Listed Species and Species of Special Concern <br />We need to recognize that use of wells for pumping in the South Platte River for recharge can have some effects on <br />natural warm water sloughs by decreasing water volume and flows. Placement of wells near these sloughs can <br />show adverse impacts. These wells should be placed nearer to the main channel of the river. Higher water tables <br />from recharge in a wet meadow may be beneficial. <br />Pages 5- 217 -228 Recreation <br />We agree with some of this summary of impacts but there are other factors that should be considered before there is <br />a general assumption of no impact or beneficial impact to recreation in Colorado. <br />It should be noted that any of the alternatives that result in loss of irrigated agricultural lands or reservoir storage <br />levels could have recreation impacts in Colorado. Loss of water from reservoirs has obvious negative impacts to <br />fisheries. These are all fluctuating reservoirs in NE Colorado so reducing water in these lakes can cause severe <br />fisheries impacts. Also by reducing irrigated agriculture along the river you may reduce hunting opportunity, <br />particularly for geese and ducks that depend on these fields for winter feed. There is also the possibility of reducing <br />populations of upland game, small game, and deer who also feed heavily in these fields, particularly in the winter. <br />Reductions in these populations will also reduce hunting and viewing recreation. <br />The assumption that operation of the Tamarack project will automatically provide increased recreation may also be <br />somewhat misleading. We believe that these recharge projects can provide increased recreation if the timing of <br />pumping is done to provide hunting habitat for waterfowl at the correct times. Pumping in September and October, <br />as an example, increases harvest opportunity for early migrating waterfowl. Pumping in Feb and March produces <br />almost no hunting opportunity but provides enhanced habitat. <br />Page 5 -123 Nesting at Lake McConaughy <br />CDOW has concerns that this plan focuses on the Lower Platte River area regarding the management actions <br />proposed for terns and plovers. It is stated that in 2003, plover counts at Lake McConaughy were 94 pairs, 114 <br />nests, and 194 fledglings. This is far and away higher numbers than anything reported for any other segment of the <br />Platte River. We question why this area, along with the nearby segments of the North and South Platte Rivers are <br />not a focal point for recovery for this species. We are concerned that the plans presented could negatively affect <br />this population for the establishment of another. Piping plovers are a state Threatened species in Colorado and <br />these plans could have a substantial impact on the riverine system here in Colorado. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.