Laserfiche WebLink
Section E: % days in a month of river call including S. Platte Compact call above the <br />Harmony #1 Ditch in Colorado. River call in Colorado represents a ditch that diverts the <br />entire river. Water for credit for Tamarack 1 and CPFD in 2007 accrues to the river <br />below the last diversion in Colorado that diverts the entire river and when no SP Compact <br />call (i.e., excess to well augmentation at the Stateline). This % days is used to compute <br />the amount of groundwater accretion water in a month accruing above the Harmony #1 <br />that is not diverted by the Harmony #1 Ditch when no SP Compact call. <br />Section F: % days in a month of river call including SP Compact call below the <br />Harmony #1 Ditch in Colorado. This % days is used to compute the amount of <br />groundwater accretion water in a month accruing below the Harmony #1 that is not <br />entirely diverted by other Colorado ditches and when no SP Compact call. The Western <br />Canal just over the Stateline in Nebraska on the S. Platte is also considered when <br />determining credits for Tamarack 1 —the Western must also not be diverting the entire <br />river during months of credit for Tamarack 1 and this did not occur in 2007 as seen by <br />comparing Stateline river flows at the Julesburg gage to Western Canal diversions. <br />The five existing augmentation plans developing water for credit in Tamarack 1 and <br />CPFD are those plans nearest the Stateline in order to minimize canal interception in <br />Colorado. These plans are the Lower South Platte -LSP, Sedgwick County Well Users - <br />SCWU, Dinsdale, Condon and Lower Logan Well Users -LLWU. LSP, SCWU, <br />Dinsdale, and Condon are all located below the Harmony 91 Ditch while LLWU is both <br />above and below the Harmony 41. There is a page in the < Colorado PRRIP Water <br />Accounting> spreadsheet for each of these plans where the net recharge inputs for each of <br />these plans is inserted in Column A; inserted are both the total net recharge by the plan <br />and the individual net recharge by each recharge structure. The inserted data is monthly <br />for the years of 2003 through 2007. These years were selected for analysis because these <br />years had the greatest new development of recharge sites. In Columns P (for Tamarack <br />1) and Column AE (for CPFD) of these pages for each plan is where the water creditable <br />to each plan for Tamarack 1 and CPFD is distributed to each plans recharge structures. <br />This distribution for Tamarack 1 is based on the % monthly excess of Section A on the <br />Setup page. This distribution for CPFD is based on the CPFD net positive accretions in <br />Section B (reduced by the net recharge at the CDOW Tamarack SWA) of the Setup page <br />distributed prorata among the four plans below Harmony #1 with any remaining CPFD <br />distributed to LLWU. <br />The creditable diversions for each plan by recharge structure for Tamarack 1 and CPFD <br />computed on each of these individual plan pages of the spreadsheet is copied to the page <br />in the spreadsheet called "AWAS input_5 plans ". Data from this page is then saved to a <br />tab- delimited text file for import to two AWAS models (one model for Tam 1 and one <br />model for CPFD). The AWAS model computes the retimed accretions to the river that <br />can be credited as replacement of shortages at Grand Island for Tamarack 1 and credited <br />as replacing the May and June deficits resulting from the CPFD. The output from the <br />two AWAS models is copied into the page of the spreadsheet called "RESULTS ". The <br />RESULTS page computes the creditable accretions for Tamarack 1 during times of <br />shortage (based on Section D of Setup page) and below the last drying diversion for each <br />plan. The Results page computes the creditable accretions for CPFD below the last river <br />2 <br />