Laserfiche WebLink
agreements about the issues at hand. The social sciences have <br />a lot to contribute here. <br />Secondly, I would suggest that we start to develop state -by- <br />state implementation plans. Senate Bill 1860 calls for some <br />research roadmaps, but that's different than having implementa- <br />tion road maps. To me, it's unconscionable that every project <br />has to start from scratch and not learn the lessons from those <br />that preceded it. These kinds of implementation road maps can <br />be used to educate other projects in other, smaller, communi- <br />ties that don't necessarily have the resources to start the project <br />from scratch. <br />Thirdly, I think we need a set of demonstration projects that are <br />visible and accessible. I would suggest that the DOE and De- <br />partment of Interior (DOI) get together to both develop, fund, <br />and acquire different technologies to get a series of demonstra- <br />tion projects that we can bring both the water industry and the <br />petroleum industry to view. <br />Lastly, we need some leadership. Right now, we in the West <br />turn to the DOI, for the most part, for water leadership. Petro- <br />leum industry turns to the DOE. Water agencies aren't used to <br />going to the DOE, and I'm sure the petroleum and oil industry <br />is not accustomed to going to the BOR. We need a point of <br />contact. The federal agencies ought to try to get together to, at <br />least, provide the initial reissuing. The only other alternative is <br />for the two industries to get together — a process that could be <br />very slow to develop from where we are now. <br />The Industry Grows a lot of Lemons <br />Produced waters are a cost to be minimized! <br />Frank Yates, Yates Petroleum Company <br />Artesia, New Mexico <br />Yates Petroleum Corporation has been looking for treat- <br />ment alternatives for several years in an effort to find <br />economically competitive alternatives to down hole disposal. <br />Several factors must be taken into account in order to effec- <br />tively pursue these potential options, including:. Economics; <br />available technologies; new technologies; legal, regulatory <br />and environmental concerns; and internal company and <br />industry politics have had an influence on progress made in <br />this arena. <br />Economics <br />Down hole disposal has been the long -time acceptable meth- <br />od of dealing with waste water associated with oil and natural <br />gas production. Reinjection of produced water is expensive <br />and can represent 50 percent of the direct operating costs of <br />many oil and gas wells. <br />There are three components to reinjection costs that must be <br />quantified: capital expenditures, direct operating costs, and <br />gathering costs. <br />-initial capital expenditures are those associated with drilling <br />a disposal well, or more commonly, converting an existing <br />dry hole to a disposal well, which can be considerably less <br />expensive. <br />Costs vary considerably across the country. In Southeast New <br />Mexico, a 7,000 -foot Delaware dry hole can be converted to a <br />disposal well for about $600,000. It may be possible to inject <br />as much as 6,000 bbls of water per day (1 bbl = 42 gal) into a <br />well like this. This scenario calculates to $100 / bbl / day of <br />capacity, a ratio used for comparative economics. <br />Conversely, in Wyoming, the subsurface strata available for <br />injection are very low in porosity and permeability. It can cost <br />$4M to drill a disposal well that will only take 4,000 bbls / <br />day. Now you're up to $1,000 bbl / day of capacity. <br />-Direct operating costs for a disposal well include costs for <br />electricity for pump operations, filters, and chemical treat- <br />ments for well bore protection. These costs can add up to <br />between $0.03 and $0.07 / bbl for some areas, more in others. <br />-The third component of cost is gathering, or getting the <br />produced water from the production facility to the disposal <br />facility. Gathering is accomplished either by pipeline or <br />by trucking, depending on the daily volumes of water to be <br />transported. These costs can range from a few cents per barrel <br />— when moving larger volumes through pipelines — to several <br />dollars per barrel to truck smaller volumes of water that do not <br />economically warrant laying gathering lines. <br />